Re: jsf-uncompressed.js in dev mode does not work out entirely

2010-06-26 Thread Jan-Kees van Andel
I've been out for a while, so it might be a stupid question. Do you serve the script via a servlet or is the file served directly? I ask because last year I did some performance tests for a client and having a servlet write a string is very expensive, compared to serving a static file. 100ms

Re: jsf-uncompressed.js in dev mode does not work out entirely

2010-06-26 Thread Werner Punz
Yes +1 for that, I will work on the issue later this year again, my guess is we probably can enable it via a chain and event listener system and header manipulation, but I have more important work pending, but I want a solution which enables debugging for all users for 2.0.1. So if we go that

Re: jsf-uncompressed.js in dev mode does not work out entirely

2010-06-26 Thread Werner Punz
Am 26.06.10 11:39, schrieb Jan-Kees van Andel: I've been out for a while, so it might be a stupid question. Do you serve the script via a servlet or is the file served directly? The files are resources within the api package so they are basically served from the standard faces-servlet. I

jsf-uncompressed.js in dev mode does not work out entirely

2010-06-25 Thread Werner Punz
Hello I have been doing some performance tuning for the last day on our jsf.js scripts. So far things look good, the performance seems to be slightly faster (about 5-15% on a modern browser) than Mojarras under my testing conditions, except for one area. jsf-uncompressed.js does not work out

Re: jsf-uncompressed.js in dev mode does not work out entirely

2010-06-25 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Werner I think we should activate it with a web config param. Debug using the real scripts in firefox is really useful. The idea could be provide a jsf-uncompressed.js file with all scripts as default on dev mode, but have a config param like