Hello everyone, I have started somewhat of a cleanup regarding the
jsf.js codebase which will be done in the following weeks.
First of all after fixing the bugs (which I will commit today), I came
to the conclusion that our utils classes are somewhat in need of a fixup
and generally some struc
This is cool! Isn't the exception handling another place to clean up?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Werner Punz schrieb:
Hello everyone, I have started somewhat of a cleanup regarding the
jsf.js codebase which will be done in the following weeks.
First of all after fixing the bugs (which I will commit
Yes definitely, the exception handling can be done better, but one step
after the other...
I already cleaned up some exception handling stuff in the utils classes,
there are no more direct references to our impl exception delegation code.
There are several things which can be improved, but c
Sounds great, Werner!
Regards,
Jakob
2010/5/10 Werner Punz
> Yes definitely, the exception handling can be done better, but one step
> after the other...
>
> I already cleaned up some exception handling stuff in the utils classes,
> there are no more direct references to our impl exception dele
Hi Jakob, the namespacing, dom and inheritance features might be useful
also for Tomahawk 2.0.
I am however not sure how we can manage it buildwise to get it in.
We might drop some of our files buildwise from the api also into tomahawk.
A double include is not really that bad because due to the
Yes, sure. However it is important to have these refactorings on core first.
Then we can adopt them to Tomahawk 2.0! I am sure we will find a way ;)
Regards,
Jakob
2010/5/11 Werner Punz
> Hi Jakob, the namespacing, dom and inheritance features might be useful
> also for Tomahawk 2.0.
> I am how
No worries the first part of the refactorings is almost done
however I need to run additional tests (I am low on unit tests
here for the javascripts, only a couple of pages testing
the protocol on http level)
So the commit probably will happen tomorrow.
Werner
Am 11.05.10 14:48, schrieb Jakob
Hia
I now have moved about 90% of the codebase to the
new class structure here is an example:
http://www.pastebin.org/222860
For everyone familiar with dojo, this looks very familiar.
Werner
Am 11.05.10 14:48, schrieb Jakob Korherr:
Yes, sure. However it is important to have these refact
Ok I have everything up and running, but I have not finished my tests yet.
The commit has to be postponed to friday.
For Mark Li, the good news is I have now the dialog example fully up and
running with the latest codebase:
http://pastebin.com/TmFGtQyv
Werner
Am 12.05.10 00:36, schrieb Wern
Ok guys it is done for now. I ran a load of new tests on the codebase
and I hope I have caught most if not all errors.
I think our _Runtime.js is now solid enough to be reused by Tomahawk and co.
What you can do with it:
a) Real prototype inheritance dojo style
b) Namespacing
c) some smaller he
That's great news, Werner!
Regards,
Jakob
2010/5/14 Werner Punz
> Ok guys it is done for now. I ran a load of new tests on the codebase and I
> hope I have caught most if not all errors.
>
> I think our _Runtime.js is now solid enough to be reused by Tomahawk and
> co.
>
> What you can do with
Ok I am now done with the Javascript refactorings,
there is probably still some room for improvement, but I think
the code now is a solid foundation for the next enhancements.
Here is a full list of what has been done
a) Namespace cleanup
b) Introduction of a base _Runtime class which provides
12 matches
Mail list logo
