Hi!
I hope its not wrong to post this to the developer list at first, but I
think there is a technical problem with the aliasbean.
Our jsf looks like this (for sure, we use include for the dataTable):
x:aliasBeansScope
x:aliasBean alias=#{coTopicEdit} value=#{coAddressEdit} /
Sean Schofield wrote:
Martin,
You might be right. Unfortunately due to our release today and the
other MyFaces business I haven't had a chance to look at the ajax
version. What you are saying about the potential difficulties in
merging sounds reasonable.
IMO there is no hurry on either
IMO there is no need for a stand-alone tiles-webapp anymore. Instead
the simple-examples should be based on tiles. If no one disagrees, i
will chuck out the tiles-example and add tiles-support to our
simple-examples.
On 7/11/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, the unconsolidate code
-Original Message-
Yes, a separate tiles example would be better IMHO.
-Manfred
-Original Message-
I am not quite sure. The whole point about the simple examples are
that they should be simple. Adding tiles to them would be too much for
the very very novice user.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-331?page=comments#action_12315826
]
Mathias Broekelmann commented on MYFACES-331:
-
I´ve tried your example and saw that the refresh don´t work. I analysed your
code of
I agree separate is better but perhaps we can get rid of the blank
example? That just sucks up bandwith IMO. (ASF bandwith since often
times the examples are downloaded from the nightly dir which is ASF
hosted and not mirrored.)
If we keep the Tiles app simple enough, I think we could justify
I know its useful but it does contain a bunch of jars and adds to the
size of the download.
sean
On 7/14/05, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUT often the blank-app is copied as a starting point for jsf-application.
Which means it still makes some sense. But maybe isolate it
It doesn't contain any jars in the source, afaik.
you won't need it as a war, but it should be in the sources.
regards,
Martin
On 7/14/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know its useful but it does contain a bunch of jars and adds to the
size of the download.
sean
On
-Original Message-
I know its useful but it does contain a bunch of jars and adds to the
size of the download.
-/Original Message-
make it a separate download and explain WHEN and WHY a developer
would/should/could use it.
Then it will be downloaded less...
regards
Alexander
Since we are going to have two components for the forseeable future
(at least in the sandbox) can I *suggest* that we call the ajax one
ajaxSuggest?
IMO ajaxInputSuggest is a little too wordy and easy to confuse with
inputSuggest.
sean
On 7/14/05, Neal Haggard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to be able to get the length of a collection in JSF EL. Is there a
way to do it? Looking at JSP 2.0 EL (which JSF uses) it allows for
functions, specifically the pre-defined length() function. However, when I
try using that with
Hi Neal,
You can use #{myCollection.size()} to get the length of a
java.util.Collection. Is that what you are looking for?
-bd-
On Jul 14, 2005, at 3:30 PM, Neal Haggard wrote:
I need to be able to get the length of a collection in JSF EL. Is
there a way to do it? Looking at JSP 2.0
Neal Haggard wrote:
I need to be able to get the length of a collection in JSF EL. Is there a way
to do it? Looking at JSP 2.0 EL (which JSF uses) it allows for functions,
specifically the pre-defined length() function. However, when I try using that
with MyFaces I get an exception
I second the suggestion.
-MattOn 7/14/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we are going to have two components for the forseeable future(at least in the sandbox) can I *suggest* that we call the ajax oneajaxSuggest?IMO ajaxInputSuggest is a little too wordy and easy to confuse with
On 7/14/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we are going to have two components for the forseeable future
(at least in the sandbox) can I *suggest* that we call the ajax one
ajaxSuggest?
IMO ajaxInputSuggest is a little too wordy and easy to confuse with
inputSuggest.
The
15 matches
Mail list logo
