The build takes a LONG time compared to the old ant method. For me, it took
24 minutes 55 seconds. This is to be expected, as maven does a lot of file
transfers the first time around. However, the following frequently occuring
message leads me to believe that we can speed things up:
What shared branch? There is only trunk ... did you mean core branch?
If the shared stuff is ready then lets put that up for a vote to
release. Then we change the dependency on the core branch and do
final testing. If we are ready can someone start a [VOTE] thread on
the dev list for releasing
Did you rebuild shared on the trunk? I will attempt to do a build
later tonight when I get home.
Sean
On 3/4/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/1_1_2
and get the following when running 'mvn install' in the base
Sean Schofield schrieb:
What shared branch? There is only trunk ... did you mean core branch?
Yes, for sure :-o all this shared/core and core/src and so on drives me
crazy :-)
---
Mario
I was under the impression that we were still going w/ one of Sean's ideas.
Basically, if its in the core it should be fixed on the branch .
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200603.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
If the team has since gone another direction than it is my own
Hi Dennis!
I was under the impression that we were still going w/ one of Sean's ideas.
Basically, if its in the core it should be fixed on the branch .
For sure, in this case it was definitely my fault.
On the other hand, I came across a couple of classes in
core/shared/tomahawk. Doing it
I've added support for deferred EL to Tomcat 6 as part of JSP 2.1.
While there's still more work to be done (around .tag files for one), I
am able to run the RI 1.2 samples without problems.
--
Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
JSF-EG, JSF-RI, EL, Facelets
Great to hear, Jacob!
Wonderful!
regards,
Martin
On 3/5/06, Jacob Hookom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added support for deferred EL to Tomcat 6 as part of JSP 2.1.
While there's still more work to be done (around .tag files for one), I
am able to run the RI 1.2 samples without problems.
In the current case it was just a too huge refactoring and I think we
should simply re-tag core now. Though, even in the future we should try
to keep the time between creating the branch and release as short as
possible.
Also I think in the future we should work on the trunk and backport
fixes to
Hello Everyone:
I have deployed the sample examples on WebSphere 6.0.2.7 using Ratinal
Software Architecht 6.0.1. Though the examples seem to be working just fine
on http://www.irian.at/myfaces.jsf, Here are some of the issues I am facing:
On most of the pages, I get the following:
Hello infra,
These web sites appear to be down.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-commits
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-announce
Dennis Byrne
On 3/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These web sites appear to be down.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-commits
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1162?page=comments#action_12368960
]
Adam Winer commented on MYFACES-1162:
-
This also might be caused by attempting to use binding to store a UIComponent
into a scope other than request. UIComponent is
Hi *,
Craig has already mentioned that there is the ADF faces proposal of a
JSF component library donation to the ASF - we, the Apache MyFaces PMC
would love to take this component set in.
We have already voted positively - does the incubator PMC according to
the new rules need to vote, too?
I
We made a small mistake in the release process this time. We really
should have created a shared branch so that we were ready to release.
I didn't really think it was necessary, however, because I did not
anticipate someone would make a major change on the trunk like this
while we're supposed to
Hi *,
Tobago would like to sign-off from the incubator.
This is the link to the project-status page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tobago.html
My (non-binding) +1.
regards,
Martin
Change NewspaperTable to be able to use extended column properly
Key: TOMAHAWK-178
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-178
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Bug
Components: Newspaper
D:\co\current\shared\shared-tomahawk\build.xml:25:
D:\co\current\shared\core\src\main\resources\org\apache\myfaces\
shared not found.
Martin's last commit appears to make this work.
Dennis Byrne
Hi Dennis!
I respect your opinions Mario but I'm afraid we don't see this the same way.
Ok. Its just a discussion :-)
I tend to lean towards *more* time between branch/tag and release. During
that time, no new features - only bug fixes that are moved to trunk after
release (at the latest).
Hi Sean!
So lets fix this mess by creating a branch before Mario's changes. We
can have the core branch work off this new shared branch and then
release shared? Make sense?
The commit where the bad started to happen is r382918, so using one
before might work.
Please do not use any older
As Sean said the mistake here is that shared was not tagged. Let's move on.
Don't feel bad, you made changes to trunk and it is unreasonable to expect it
to stay compatible w/ the branch. This would happen to someone eventually. I
am glad it happened in a big way so that it didn't happen in
21 matches
Mail list logo
