Javascript in Tomahawk components produces invalid markup when output as
application/xhtml + xml with 1.2 RI
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-722
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1229?page=all ]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1229.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
Was already fixed...
JSR-252 Issue #67: Allow the resetting of an input component's value by
Hi,
I am going this days through the open JIRAs for JSR-252 (JSF 1.2).
Some of them are only documentation issues, so are very easy to solve.
The others range from easy to moderate. So I am implementing time as
long as my job, family, friends, weather, and psychological state
allows it.
Does
Hi,As far as I know all of the issues are in JIRA.I've also checked through the open jira issues as well and see some of them are already implemented. This causes a bit confusion.Cagatay
On 10/4/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I am going this days through the open JIRAs for JSR-252
I know, we should close them as we see it. We might be closer than we think :)
Bruno
On 10/4/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know all of the issues are in JIRA.
I've also checked through the open jira issues as well and see some of them
are already implemented.
Hi,
MYFACES-1257 [1] says that in JSF 1.2 we have to use a schema for
validation. Can we use the same schema that the JSF-RI? Is there any
legal problem with that? I guess there is no problem if we include
Sun's license header on the file?
Cheers,
Bruno
[1]
On 10/3/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going this days through the open JIRAs for JSR-252 (JSF 1.2).
Does anybody know if the JIRAs we have are most of the effort, only a
small part.. ?
I believe that there are jira issues for most of 1.2. Not everything
got an issue, though,
Hi Bruno,
Can you please ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this?
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 07:57 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: [jsr-252] xsd schema
Hi,
MYFACES-1257 [1] says that in JSF 1.2 we have to
Great Bruno!
I do believe there is not as much missing as we might have thought.
How are you testing - are you working with Glassfish?
regards,
Martin
On 10/4/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going this days through the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-722?page=comments#action_12439725
]
Martin Marinschek commented on TOMAHAWK-722:
If the correct content-type is set, the HtmlResponseWriter of MyFaces will
automatically emit the
We've had the same problem with the DTDs already, I suppose its the
same license. We were allowed to deliver the DTDs within the
implementation, when the license was included in the NOTICE/LICENSE
section.
regards,
Martin
On 10/4/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Can you
there are 3 Java EE 5 Compatible Implementations:http://java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jspSAP NetWeaver Application Server Java EE 5 Edition
TmaxSoft JEUS 6Sun Java System Application Server Platform Edition 9 (Glassfish)does any body know what implementation of JSF are they using?is
Hi Arash,We'll be testing MyFaces 1.2 on Glassfish - that should be a suitable test-bed. You could join in on the March to 1.2 and submit some patches to JIRA if you'd like!
13 matches
Mail list logo