[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481067
]
Arvid Hülsebus commented on TOBAGO-317:
---
It looks like the link/a needs the return. For buttons it seems to
Hi Martin!
I've already mentioned that with this addition, I see Trinidad as a
Top Level project rather than a sub-level project of MyFaces.
What do you think about that?
What about combining our efforts providing a modern component library?
Creating a myfaces commons and a cleaned-up
Hey Mario,
that would be a good idea, IMO.
The first step should be the long discussed myfaces-commons (Volker et al).
Such a *small* artifact, containing converters and validators for
instance, can also benefit from Trinidad's base in adding client side
conversion and validation support,
Re-rendered input components redisplay their submitted value on non-immediate
action
Key: MYFACES-1563
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1563
Sometimes ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in layout or rarely non exception but
mixed layout
---
Key: TOBAGO-323
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-323
Hi,
I've updated the new javax.faces.messages resource bundle for the english
locale according to the spec.
But for other languages we need to add the translated bundles.
Cagatay
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481090
]
Volker Weber commented on TOBAGO-323:
-
Could you retry with replacing '!-- Zeile --' by %-- Zeile --% ?
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved MYFACES-1203.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Updated the default message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved MYFACES-1237.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
JSR-252 Issue #81: Enable the
Any idea why the SelectBox example always fails the door validation?
http://example.irian.at/example-simple-20070315/selectbox.jsf
Paul Spencer
Translation layer is not hiding the complete app, but only for the fixed size
of the screen resolution
--
Key: TOBAGO-324
URL:
From: Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've already mentioned that with this addition, I see Trinidad as a
Top Level project rather than a sub-level project of MyFaces.
What do you think about that?
I agree that Trinidad should be a TLP. My argument for this would have more to
do
I think MyFaces will be the looser if we split due to the
interoperability question.
to me, MyFaces is the runtime, the impl. of the spec.
Tomahawk² would need a overhaul, and that is an interesting option to
use Trinidad stuff in here. There is no need to kick Tomahawk out.
Useful components
From what I've seen, I'd agree. Tomahawk has a few good
components, but I don't think our architecture is all that special.
However, I'd also like us to try to pick up whatever can be done to
work better with Tobago.
On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for doing
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
At some point we should discuss what an ideal JSF component framework
architecture looks like and whether it's feasible for all of our
components to be a part of such an architecture.
+1
the at some point probably is now, with the jsf 1.2 transition,
people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481195
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-1559:
---
Thanks for implementing this, I've hooked it up to geronimo and it
On 3/15/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I've seen, I'd agree. Tomahawk has a few good
components, but I don't think our architecture is all that special.
Yes, there are some really nice things. Scheduler for instance and
also in the sandbox.
There are some things in
fails the door validation?
http://example.irian.at/example-simple-20070315/selectbox.jsf
Paul Spencer
From: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gary!
Tomahawk and Tobago have their own strategies too. Often they can
play nicely together, but since they don't standardize on a single API
for delivering these Web 2.0 features, they will never truly be
interoperable (IMHO).
I agree with the philosophy of making Trinidad the Base, and refactoring
Tomahawk into it. I've been using Seam a lot in my day job, and the
Seam-Trinidad compatibility is more stable than Seam-Tomahawk. A point of
contention with the Seam folks is the ExtentionsFilter, which they perceive
to be
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/15/07, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
From what I've seen, I'd agree. Tomahawk has a few good
components, but I don't think our architecture is all that special.
Yes, there are some really nice things. Scheduler for instance and
also in the
Still a huge first step would be a myfaces commons, containing stuff
like updateActionlistener and validators/converters.
On 3/15/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that even moving the validators and converters out would be a
big step since they provide client side
Ryan:
Thank you for all of your efforts on this item. Hopefully, your patch will
be included soon.
Dennis
On 3/14/07, Ryan Lubke (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Haimberger updated MYFACES-1565:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Added a more user-friendly default error
Also one *target* should be getting rid of the extension filter and
use an approach like Trinidad document or Tobago's page, where the
components (their renderers) register themselfs and put out their
resources, like funny javascript.
also the common fileupload (done in Tobago Contrib, already).
/example-simple-20070315/selectbox.jsf
Paul Spencer
I know very little about Trinidad, but if the primary purpose is to
provide javascript and stylesheets, then the document tag could just
be like any other tag and put into the HEAD section, yes? And
having multiple kinds of these tags should not be a conflict.
trinidadResourceProvider/
On 3/15/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One big concern I have is that we do not go to such an extreme (like
Tobago did) that we are no longer compatible with other component
sets. Once you start requiring a specific kind of form or document,
then you've just made yourself
SelectBox example always fails the door validation
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-932
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-932
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
/example-simple-20070315/selectbox.jsf
Paul Spencer
t:column attributes not populating HTML td attributes correctly
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-933
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue
The following issues are marked as resolved in 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT. Should
this be changed to 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT?
[TOMAHAWK-903] - Changing the rendered state of inputDate causes a
NullPointerException
[TOMAHAWK-915] - Base default event used by submitOnEvent on enclosing
Paul Spencer schrieb:
The following issues are marked as resolved in 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT. Should
this be changed to 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT?
[TOMAHAWK-903] - Changing the rendered state of inputDate causes a
NullPointerException
[TOMAHAWK-915] - Base default event used by submitOnEvent
Werner,
The list of items was from the Release Notes of Jira. That issue has
a Fix Version set even though the status is open.
Is the issue fixed?
Paul Spencer
Werner Punz wrote:
Paul Spencer schrieb:
The following issues are marked as resolved in 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT. Should
this be changed
Not to my knowledge
unless someone has fixed it the last few days...
Paul Spencer schrieb:
Werner,
The list of items was from the Release Notes of Jira. That issue has
a Fix Version set even though the status is open.
Is the issue fixed?
Paul Spencer
Werner Punz wrote:
Paul Spencer
Please update the Fix version on the issue.
Paul Spencer
Werner Punz wrote:
Not to my knowledge
unless someone has fixed it the last few days...
Paul Spencer schrieb:
Werner,
The list of items was from the Release Notes of Jira. That issue has
a Fix Version set even though the status is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481349
]
Guido Dubois commented on TOBAGO-322:
-
I tried to find a workaround but I found nothing what can help to solve
ah ok misunderstanding from my side
:-)
sorry about that
Paul Spencer schrieb:
Please update the Fix version on the issue.
Paul Spencer
Werner Punz wrote:
Not to my knowledge
unless someone has fixed it the last few days...
Paul Spencer schrieb:
Werner,
The list of items was from
I noticed that a lot of source files don't have the svn property
svn:eol-style=native set (at least in 1.2 core). Apache suggests to
use it - see http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html for more
info.
I'm currently not sure if it is wise to change it now so that every
non binary file has
On 3/15/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that a lot of source files don't have the svn property
svn:eol-style=native set (at least in 1.2 core). Apache suggests to
use it - see http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html for more
info.
I'm currently not sure if it is
Hello MyFaces devs -
Back in December I proposed a panel discussion at JavaOne about the
marriage of JSF and Ajax. I tried to contact several random members of
the MyFaces development team, to ask for a participant, but I never got
a response. Would one of you be interested in being on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481479
]
David Steinkopff commented on TOBAGO-323:
-
ok, the comments could be the problem.
% % are jsp tags and jsp
MArtin and Manfred are having a BOF at J1.
I think one of them should go!
What about asking also in Trinidad land?
Adam Winer, for instance ?
Thx,
Matthias
On 3/16/07, Gary Horen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello MyFaces devs –
Back in December I proposed a panel discussion at JavaOne
I'd certainly be willing to be there!
regards,
Martin
On 3/16/07, Gary Horen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello MyFaces devs –
Back in December I proposed a panel discussion at JavaOne about the marriage
of JSF and Ajax. I tried to contact several random members of the MyFaces
development
hello,
again the the mrmaven account is locked; I wanted to readd Trinidad
trunk and a faces12 branch. Can someone unlock the user?
(did the psswd change??)
Thx,
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail:
45 matches
Mail list logo
