Sorry, resending to dev list.
Hi!
And why not helping fixing the tomahak component?
Shouldn't we stop duplicating work and making the user worring about which
comp-lib to choose?
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 3:36 pm
On Dec 15, 2007 7:29 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experimenting with some changes to the myfaces site.
I see that there are some files in maven APT format, and some in XDOC. Which
is the preferred format for files?
In particular, I'd like to split docs into versions that
Heaven, must still be drunken ..
Hi!
And why not helping fixing the tomahak component?
Shouldn't we stop duplicating work and making the user worring about which
comp-lib to choose?
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007
still drunken seems like. sorry for the noise.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 3:58 pm
Subject: Re: [site] preferred doc format for website
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgReply-To: [EMAIL
+1 on apt
-1 on xdoc
APT is *much* easier to write.
Why do we have to choose one? As long as the author is writing
documentation, we should be happy right?
-Andrew
On Dec 15, 2007 7:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 on APT
+1 on XML
On Dec 15, 2007 3:29 PM, Simon
I personally like the APT format.
However
+1 on both formats (the author chooses)
--Manfred
On 12/15/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on apt
-1 on xdoc
APT is *much* easier to write.
Why do we have to choose one? As long as the author is writing
documentation, we should be
Hi,
I think, I'll use http://slf4j.org/ for the logger in commons.
What do you think about that ?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
+1
--Manfred
On 12/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think, I'll use http://slf4j.org/ for the logger in commons.
What do you think about that ?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
does this mean EVERY user has to drop in a slf4j jar then?
Why not stick with cl and those willing to use sl4j drop in the adapter jar?
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 5:53 pm
Subject: [commons] What Logger ?
To: Reply-
I think, that Manfredo will also put it into myfaces-core
:-)
Simon suggested to create a MyFaces Logger,
but... commons should not depend on that.
(a cool discussion on the hackaton)
-M
On 15 Dec 2007 19:01:00 +0100, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does this mean EVERY user has to
could you explain what we gain from that switch?
I just see one additional jar as the user has to deal with cl anyway.
It is the defacto standard.
Did you consider the java std log facility. Might be as good as sl4j.
A cl adapter might be doable there too.
Mario
-Original Message-
The issue is that Trinidad (ADF faces) has always emitted
internationalised log messages, by using its own logging implementation.
But commons-logging does not offer any help for that. If code wants to
emit a log message that can be internationalised, it looks like this:
if
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 17:52 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I think, I'll use http://slf4j.org/ for the logger in commons.
What do you think about that ?
[first, sorry for not replying in-thread. I can currently receive emails but
cannot send them except via a web/interface.
this sounds like yet another complexity.
I18n can be solved by a custom app layer even easier, no?
So this would mean we should go your custom myfaces logger wrapper. I would not
complain if commons depend on it, I think.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
On Dec 15, 2007 8:06 PM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 17:52 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I think, I'll use http://slf4j.org/ for the logger in commons.
What do you think about that ?
[first, sorry for not replying in-thread. I can currently
The trinidad logger wraps the JDK one.
It internally looksup a resourcebundle and with
getMessage(SomeKey,...) you get the translated
msg, which you put into methods like warning(String);
On Dec 15, 2007 7:59 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is that Trinidad (ADF faces) has always
Hi Mario,
You mean a myfaces-commons-logging module, that the following depend on?
* myfaces-commons-*
* myfaces-core
* myfaces-trinidad
The problem again is that each of those has its own resource bundle for its
messages, and that there would need to be some mechanism for it to inform the
This is the formal vote for the new myfaces master POM version 4.
You can find the signed release candidate at [1].
Please vote
+1 if you reviewed the new master pom version 4 and think we can use it
-1 if you found a flaw or potential problem with the new master pom
Thanks,
--Manfred
[1]
+1
On 15/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Dec 15, 2007 8:34 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the formal vote for the new myfaces master POM version 4.
You can find the signed release candidate at [1].
Please vote
+1 if you reviewed the
I also fiddled with the site a few weeks ago... and got stuck. ;-)
Well here is the outcome of my fiddling:
http://people.apache.org/~manolito/myfaces-site/
Notice the collapsible menu items. I made them uncollapsed for this
example, but they should be collapsed on the main page (like on the
+1
On Dec 15, 2007 10:24 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 15/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Dec 15, 2007 8:34 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the formal vote for the new myfaces master POM version 4.
You can find
I like the sub-categories from Manfred's proposal
-M
On Dec 15, 2007 9:45 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also fiddled with the site a few weeks ago... and got stuck. ;-)
Well here is the outcome of my fiddling:
http://people.apache.org/~manolito/myfaces-site/
Notice the
Hi,
there is this maven plugins folder for the Trinidad Plugins (see [1]).
The Trinidad inside the name may confuse people. The plugins
are generally usable outside of Trinidad as well.
The maven-faces-plugin for instance, is used in other projects, such
as MyFaces Core, or MyFaces Commons.
The
Bernd's wagon could be also hosted there as well.
-M
On Dec 15, 2007 11:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
there is this maven plugins folder for the Trinidad Plugins (see [1]).
The Trinidad inside the name may confuse people. The plugins
are generally usable outside of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12552149
]
Kito D. Mann commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-20:
---
FWIW, I just applied the patch locally and it appears
+1 About the naming, though, this seems to be more myfaces-build-tools
than myfaces-dev-tools, because as far as I understand, this artifacts
are used during the build, not for just development...
Thanks for the good work!
Bruno
On 15/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
26 matches
Mail list logo
