Re: embedded table

Hi Mario, thanks - but that part I understood. I was just wondering about the header part of your first example. I think I understood it now - you have a header per row for the details in this row, and also allow each main-row to have a header now? regards, Martin On 1/24/08, Mario Ivankovits

Re: embedded table

Hi Martin, I think I understood it now - you have a header per row for the details in this row, and also allow each main-row to have a header now? I am not sure if this describes it exactly - it is not about having headers. Or lets say, one header for three nested tables. Have a look at

Re: embedded table

I don't get through to this server, sorry :( regards, Martin On 1/24/08, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Martin, I think I understood it now - you have a header per row for the details in this row, and also allow each main-row to have a header now? I am not sure if this

Re: embedded table

Martin Marinschek schrieb: I don't get through to this server, sorry :( Sorry, try this one: http://www.ops.co.at/~opsj/table.html Ciao, Mario

Re: embedded table

Hi Mario, ok, now I completely understand the use-case - I still don't understand the source-code, though. Shouldn't this work somewhat similar to how the detailStamp in t:dataTable works now? regards, Martin On 1/24/08, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Marinschek schrieb: I

Re: embedded table

Hi! Shouldn't this work somewhat similar to how the detailStamp in t:dataTable works now? Yep, why not, should work that way too. The real magic will be the embedded=true attribute to the datatable, and a different way how to define the column header for the master table. Ciao, Mario

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-1181) allow to embed a datatable within the parent

allow to embed a datatable within the parent Key: TOMAHAWK-1181 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1181 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Issue Type: New Feature Components:

Re: [Trinidad] CoreRenderer static methods

I agree that they should be on XhtmlRenderer since it's XHTML specific, but I also agree with Andrew on the static part. There are many methods in Trinidad that are static for a reason that's oblivious to me and those two are part of them. While on the XhtmlRenderer vs CoreRenderer issue, I think

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-1148) Action defined in navigationMenuItem doesn't work with tomahawk-sandbox

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12562115#action_12562115 ] Suraj Shah commented on TOMAHAWK-1148: -- I have the same issue. The only way that

[build tools] why there is a tag myfaces-plugin-parent-1.0.0 and the artifacts are not on maven repo?

Hi Checking tag dir of myfaces-build-tools I have noted that exists a 1.0.0 version why the artifacts are not on maven repo? Did the vote for this part not started yet? regards Leonardo Uribe

Re: [Trinidad] CoreRenderer static methods

Simon Lessard wrote: I agree that they should be on XhtmlRenderer since it's XHTML specific, but I also agree with Andrew on the static part. There are many methods in Trinidad that are static for a reason that's oblivious to me and those two are part of them. I didn't think there was any

Re: [Trinidad] CoreRenderer static methods

In the future, I think we should make that method as well as PropertyKey class generic aware. I completely agree. I did this on a branch one night but never got around to submitting the patch. that would be great. -Matthias -- Blake Sullivan Regards, ~ Simon /** *

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-833) Ability to sking branding facet for tr:panelPage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Cooper resolved TRINIDAD-833. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.6-core 1.0.6-core Added

[VOTE] release for myfaces build tools archetypes 1.0.0

Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.0 release of Apache MyFaces Build Tools Archetypes out. Please note that this archetypes require myfaces 1.2.2 to work: The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]). There are 4 archetypes: myfaces-archetype-helloworld