On December 6 2010 I opened MYFACES-2995 and was promptly informed that it
could not be considered for 2.0.3 due to lack of time for review.
On January 11 I asked whether it would be possible to consider it then and
received no reply.
Is there any chance any committers could actually review
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:00 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On December 6 2010 I opened MYFACES-2995 and was promptly informed that it
could not be considered for 2.0.3 due to lack of time for review.
On January 11 I asked whether it would be possible to consider it then and
InstanceProducer not serializable
-
Key: EXTCDI-130
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-130
Project: MyFaces CODI
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Matthias Weßendorf
Deploying a WAR file,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992387#comment-12992387
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on EXTCDI-130:
---
@PreDestroy Has Called 2 times
--
Key: MYFACES-3040
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3040
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JSR-314
Affects Versions: 2.0.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992393#comment-12992393
]
Mark Struberg commented on MYFACES-3040:
Do you mean JSF managed beans with
+1
Am 09.02.11 07:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.4 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared
Lost ViewAccessScope when re post action with navigation
Key: EXTCDI-131
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-131
Project: MyFaces CODI
Issue Type: Bug
Hi seems this went a little bit under, I only can apologize for this,
and I assume everyone else is my opinion also, given the importance of
this bug I guess Leo should have a serious look at it and integrate it
Asap, I cannot really since this is not my domain, but more Leos who has
worked on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992417#comment-12992417
]
Werner Punz commented on TOMAHAWK-1389:
---
I am checking out the dojo fixes and
+1
Leonardo Uribe píše v St 09. 02. 2011 v 01:07 -0500:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.4 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992428#comment-12992428
]
Werner Punz commented on TOMAHAWK-1389:
---
Hello I have checked the patch, dont
Build fails due to invalid parent relationship on examples 2.0
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1563
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1563
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992452#comment-12992452
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on MYFACES-3040:
-
Yes.
@PreDestroy Has Called 2 times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved TOMAHAWK-1563.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Build fails due to invalid parent relationship on examples 2.0
Allow the definition of resourcebundle by name as in faces-config.xml file
--
Key: MYFACESTEST-41
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACESTEST-41
Project: MyFaces Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACESTEST-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rudy De Busscher resolved MYFACESTEST-41.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT
See for an example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992473#comment-12992473
]
Werner Punz commented on TOMAHAWK-1389:
---
Ok I tried the tableSuggestAjax demo now
Hi
I already saw the patch, but I forget to do some comments about it.
First of all, 2.0.4 is a quick fix release, so new features or improvements
are not being considered for this one.
The patch provided on MYFACES-2995 cannot be applied it its current form.
The reason is it suggest a new
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/9 Martin Koci martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com
+1
Leonardo Uribe píše v St 09. 02. 2011 v 01:07 -0500:
Hi,
I was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-2031:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-2
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992473#comment-12992473
]
Werner Punz edited comment on TOMAHAWK-1389 at 2/9/11 1:56 PM:
Hi
2011/2/9 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On December 6 2010 I opened MYFACES-2995 and was promptly informed that it
could not be considered for 2.0.3 due to lack of time for review.
On January 11 I asked whether it would be possible to consider it then and
received no reply.
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved TOMAHAWK-1389.
---
Resolution: Fixed
TableSuggestAjax - security popup in IE7 when using SSL
If it is for OSGI only I think the bundle only is fine with me
If not I dont have any problem to add an integration module, where all
the container specfic integration stuff can move into if it is not
hostable in our core.
Might be worthwhile to add such a module anyway so that we can isolate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992513#comment-12992513
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-3039:
One other idea might be to move a
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
2011/2/9 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
On December 6 2010 I opened MYFACES-2995 and was promptly informed that it
could not be considered for 2.0.3 due to lack of time for review.
On January 11 I asked whether
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992575#comment-12992575
]
Michael Freedman commented on MYFACES-3039:
---
I have to respectively disagree.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.4
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 1:52 PM
+1
regards,gerhard
This is NOT for osgi. The ee classloading model does not require a separate
classloader for each war in an ear, whereas currently the myfaces api
implementation assumes that web apps can be distinguished by the thread context
classloader. So the idea behind the patch is to provide a way to
30 matches
Mail list logo
