[jira] Created: (TOBAGO-973) Disabled Button/Link does not use the Disabled Icon

2011-02-10 Thread Rainer Rohloff (JIRA)
Disabled Button/Link does not use the Disabled Icon - Key: TOBAGO-973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-973 Project: MyFaces Tobago Issue Type: Bug Components:

About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308

2011-02-10 Thread Udo Schnurpfeil
Hi, I've some comments to the JVM bug for the bad number 2.2250738585072012e-00308 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3024) The problem occures for values which are very very low. But the hotfix also rejects numbers like 2.22507385850720120e-10 which is not so abnormal. Would

Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308

2011-02-10 Thread Mark Struberg
txs 4 the review! But the hotfix also rejects numbers like 2.22507385850720120e-10 which is not so abnormal. not abnormal but still moderately unlikely. I agree for a long term scenario. Basically the default should be to disable this workaround and to make it available via configuration.

Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308

2011-02-10 Thread Udo Schnurpfeil
BTW: The hotfix from Oracle is for 1.4, 5.0 and 6.0. Regards Udo Am 10.02.11 12:06, schrieb Mark Struberg: txs 4 the review! But the hotfix also rejects numbers like 2.22507385850720120e-10 which is not so abnormal. not abnormal but still moderately unlikely. I agree for a long term

Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308

2011-02-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Udo, is there a link to their bug? pretty interesting that they now fix it for almost everything :) On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de wrote: BTW: The hotfix from Oracle is for 1.4, 5.0 and 6.0. Regards Udo Am 10.02.11 12:06, schrieb Mark Struberg: txs

Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308

2011-02-10 Thread Mark Struberg
but do they release 1.2 and 5.0 also to the public, or only to paying customers? LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 2/10/11, Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de wrote: From: Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de Subject: Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308 To: MyFaces Development

Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308

2011-02-10 Thread Mark Struberg
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alert-cve-2010-4476-305811.html LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 2/10/11, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org Subject: Re: About the JVM bug with 2.2250738585072012e-00308 To: MyFaces Development

Re: Maven3 ?

2011-02-10 Thread Bruno Aranda
With a similar issue in one of my projects, related to the slightly different version range resolution with maven 2 and 3 I just came across this:

Time for a new Trindiad Beta Release

2011-02-10 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Hey everyone, Now might be a good time for a new Trinidad 2.0 beta release. Does anyone have any issues that need to be addressed before I start this process? If not, I'll plan on starting the release process tomorrow. Thanks Scott O'Bryan

[TRINIDAD] Time for a new Trindiad Beta Release

2011-02-10 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Sorry about not adding the tag to this.. ;) On 02/10/2011 11:10 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey everyone, Now might be a good time for a new Trinidad 2.0 beta release. Does anyone have any issues that need to be addressed before I start this process? If not, I'll plan on starting the release

Re: Time for a new Trindiad Beta Release

2011-02-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Fine with me! -M On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote: Hey everyone, Now might be a good time for a new Trinidad 2.0 beta release.  Does anyone have any issues that need to be addressed before I start this process?  If not, I'll plan on starting the

Re: [TRINIDAD] Time for a new Trindiad Beta Release

2011-02-10 Thread Blake Sullivan
I'm all good. -- Blake Sullivan On 2/10/11 10:24 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Sorry about not adding the tag to this.. ;) On 02/10/2011 11:10 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey everyone, Now might be a good time for a new Trinidad 2.0 beta release. Does anyone have any issues that need to be

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Tobago 1.0.33

2011-02-10 Thread Udo Schnurpfeil
Hi, I've updated the Tobago Demo on http://irian.biz/tobago-example-demo/ to 1.0.33. (I've also applied the floating point patch for 2.2250738585072012e-308 from Oracle on the open JDK and it works fine.) Regards Udo Am 07.02.11 23:36, schrieb Bernd Bohmann: The vote has passed with the

[jira] Reopened: (TOMAHAWK-1389) TableSuggestAjax - security popup in IE7 when using SSL

2011-02-10 Thread Werner Punz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Werner Punz reopened TOMAHAWK-1389: --- ok as it seems the, issue is in another codepart and as it seems the outerHTML = seems to

Re: Revision numbers in MANIFEST.MF file (was: Re: svn commit: r1069504 - in /myfaces/trinidad/trunk: trinidad-api/pom.xml trinidad-impl/pom.xml)

2011-02-10 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello Matthias, For a release the revision number is not needed. For a snapshot it might be helpful if someone reports a bug and it's not clear with revision was the base for the snapshot. Regards Bernd Am 10.02.2011 19:23 schrieb Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org: Having the actual

[jira] Resolved: (EXTCDI-130) InstanceProducer not serializable

2011-02-10 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek resolved EXTCDI-130. - Resolution: Won't Fix that's a weld bug. as far as we know it will be fixed with weld

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-3039) MyFaces broken in Portlet environment: Fails to support extendable FacesContextFactory/FacesContext/ExternalContext

2011-02-10 Thread Scott O'Bryan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12993277#comment-12993277 ] Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-3039: Ahhh yes. Mike, you're one hundred

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-1958) Client tr:numberConverter with type=currency incorrectly handles arabic locale for positive values

2011-02-10 Thread Gabrielle Crawford (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabrielle Crawford resolved TRINIDAD-1958. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-2 Assignee:

Re: [TRINIDAD] Time for a new Trindiad Beta Release

2011-02-10 Thread Andy Schwartz
Gang - I was somewhat hoping to get a fix in for this issue soon: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2030 Unfortunately, I am out of the office today/tomorrow. Any chance we can hold off on firing up the release just a bit to give me a chance to get this in? Andy

Re: Issue 2995 - Leo please read

2011-02-10 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi David There are some points to take into consideration for myfaces-api jar 1. It is preferred that myfaces-api have the less amount of compile or runtime dependencies to work. Right now, myfaces 2.0.x api and impl only require: commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar commons-codec-1.4.jar

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-3039) MyFaces broken in Portlet environment: Fails to support extendable FacesContextFactory/FacesContext/ExternalContext

2011-02-10 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3039. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT Assignee: Leonardo