Hi Matthias,
The first idea might be the most reliable for tracking the history of the
issues. It looks like we have quite a few issues still open right now and
if moving them is such a pain, perhaps we should leave them there.
If it is possible to disable the creation of new issues under
In Trinidad, to get the layout in the diagram you showed and the implicit
tab stops to go with it, I would use a fragment similar to this:
tr:panelFormLayout inlineStyle=width: 400px; labelWidth=100
fieldWidth=100 rows=1 maxColumns=2
tr:selectOneChoice label=Salutation
f:selectItem
Hi Jeanne,
That is fine. It should cause no problems.
If pretty-printing is used for purposes other than just debugging, we may
want to consider how many elements are not listed. If that list is shorter,
we ought to change this so we only compare against the shortest list of
names. I believe
Congratulations Gabrielle!
On 5/18/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although the world's end is close: I'm a good swimmer and I'm not
afraid of sharks Mr Grant Pirate Smith!
:)
On 5/18/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, welcome Gabrielle. Please excuse the disturbance
I think decoupling of these renderers would be a good thing. The trick will
be to make sure the form item renders properly when it is a direct child of
the form layout component. Let's say that you put a tr:panelGroupLayout (or
some other non form layout component) inbetween the form layout
+1 on supporting an iterator around form items, I feel that would be quite a
powerful enhancement
On 6/5/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/4/07, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think decoupling of these renderers would be a good thing. The trick
will be to make sure
+1
On 6/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good, I'm now +1.
-- Adam
On 6/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrm, nevermind, I think I was grabbing a cached version.
-- Adam
On 6/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dist .tar.gz still contains
+1
On 6/25/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.1 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad Plugins out. This is the first release of the 1.2.x
plugins series.
The artifacts are deployed to my private
+1
On 7/2/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/1/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/1/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/1/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/1/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jeanne,
I also like these changes.
Thank you,
Matt
On 7/19/07, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering that I reviewed them, it isn't surprising that I like all of
these changes.
-- Blake Sullivan
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
Hi there,
I have some new Skin API proposals I would
+1 (non-binding)
On 7/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not: how many users are ready to make the jump to
JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are
on JSP 2.0 or earlier.
It'd make my life way easier if the Trinidad trunk were 1.2,
definitely, I just doubt
[x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
On 8/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf
I committed the golden test file changes and had Andrew review them to make
sure they are what he expected.
Regards,
Matt
On 10/1/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, this was my mistake. I merged my code in from a
different file and apparently forgot the imports. Being
I suspect it is a typo or miscommunication. Probably 1.1 to 1.2 instead.
On 10/22/07, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow... That's brave of them
Dennis Byrne wrote:
Caucho claims to have implemented and released JSF 2.0 [1] before the
spec was finished!
[1]
[x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
Thank you Matthias
On 10/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.3 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account
+1
On Nov 8, 2007 4:28 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
+1.
Bruno Aranda wrote:
+1
On 08/11/2007, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
I just had to get myfaces 1.2 to use 1.2.4 because of a bug fix
On 11/8/07, Matthias
+1 thank you Matthias
On Nov 9, 2007 8:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Nov 9, 2007 1:41 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.4 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are
+1
On Nov 12, 2007 5:10 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 11/12/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Nov 13, 2007 12:03 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.4 release of the Apache
I've logged an improvement request for the following issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-822
Before I start working on this, I wanted to gather feedback from you all.
Thank you,
Matt
+0 I have had troubles with the reverse structure of having the legacy
code on the trunk and the latest in a branch so I would like that to
switch too. As Jeanne points out, I think having 2 trunks would make
merging more difficult--at least if the rules remained as noted in
Adam's wiki. Now, if
to adding the trunk and I think Matt's suggestion is the best way
to do this without being too cumbersome.
Matt Cooper wrote:
+0 I have had troubles with the reverse structure of having the legacy
code on the trunk and the latest in a branch so I would like that to
switch too. As Jeanne
FYI - I went ahead and commited the golden file changes r595766.
Perhaps I lost the email but I am a little concerned that I never saw
a continuum build failure for this so there may be yet a bigger issue
here too with the build automation.
Regards,
Matt
On Nov 15, 2007 6:21 AM, Matthias
Matt Cooper wrote:
I've logged an improvement request for the following issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-822
Before I start working on this, I wanted to gather feedback from you all.
Thank you,
Matt
this is useful. Can you
elaborate?
Thanks,
- Jeanne
Matt Cooper wrote:
I've logged an improvement request for the following issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-822
Before I start working on this, I wanted to gather feedback from you
all.
Thank you,
Matt
+1
On Nov 27, 2007 1:47 PM, Gary Kind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
+1
Gabrielle Crawford wrote:
+1
Bruno Aranda wrote:
+1
On 27/11/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Nov 27, 2007 10:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL
Perhaps this release should wait on a fix for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-843
On Nov 28, 2007 8:29 AM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Nov 27, 2007 1:47 PM, Gary Kind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
+1
Gabrielle Crawford wrote
:53 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this release should wait on a fix for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-843
On Nov 28, 2007 8:29 AM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Nov 27, 2007 1:47 PM, Gary Kind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
tomorrow :-)
On Nov 28, 2007 10:53 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Perhaps this release should wait on a fix for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-843
On Nov 28, 2007 8:29 AM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
3. The most appreciated color combination from the previous logo snapshot.
It's actually my favorite combination, is a good balancing between two
harmonious colors. Also green transmits the sensation of the environment
friendly technology, a present and future trend in many organizations.
Any of those look great to me. I do have 2 comments and a question:
Comment A:
The text is not in the same font as that of the MyFaces logo. I would
prefer to be consistent in font choice.
Comment B:
I find things that are in all capital letters to be more jarring to read
than either all
Like Matthias, I cleaned out my .m2/repository and trunk and found that
using mvn install was successful.
MVN 2.0.6
Java 1.5.0_13
Mac OS X 10.5.1
-Matt
On Dec 4, 2007 2:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm running the same platform also Andrew and it's breaking for me
as
This is great news. Thank you guys!
On Dec 7, 2007 12:30 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
the long dicussed second trunk has finally arrived. Thanks to Andrew,
for doing this.
That also means, that there are now nightly builds for both versions:
1.0x. AND 1.2.x
Great design!
I did notice something a little different: the logo appears to be rotated
more now. Once we have final a pdf/png/etc, we probably should be
consistent with the rotation of the faces.
I can't wait til we have a Trinidad skin that matches. Once the logo files
are finalized we/I can
I prefer draft #4 as is.
On Jan 8, 2008 1:21 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
#4 but with the news style from #2 would be my preference
On Jan 8, 2008 11:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they look cool;
I tend to vote +1 on the draft #4;
Once it gets
One minor change for all of the designs is the name of Apache in Apache
Software Foundation. I'm not sure it is supposed to be capitalized as
APACHE so that'd be the only change I'd recommend.
Thank you,
Matt
On Jan 8, 2008 2:30 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer draft #4
I know it's not quite the most ideal solution but you could take a
screenshot of it too.
E.g. on a Mac, their built-in screen capture features can be invoked by
pressing Command+Shift+3 or Command+Shift+4.
Regards,
Matt
On Jan 10, 2008 1:50 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OR you
+1
On Jan 11, 2008 11:05 AM, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
Bruno Aranda wrote:
+1
On 11/01/2008, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Jan 10, 2008 10:49 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
On Jan 10, 2008 9:49 PM,
+1
On Jan 11, 2008 11:04 AM, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
+1 Sure, why not... :)
Andrew Robinson wrote:
+1
On Jan 10, 2008 11:45 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Jan 10, 2008
I like this because this will allow the ability to customize the setting on
a per-user basis.
Thank you guys,
Matt
On Jan 12, 2008 12:03 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds interesting.
Actually, it would be good, to start polish our renderers and put in
some more fancy
+1
On Feb 8, 2008 9:38 AM, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
On 2/8/08, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Feb 8, 2008 12:40 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.6
+1
On Feb 8, 2008 2:46 PM, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Feb 8, 2008 3:25 AM, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
On 2/8/08, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Feb 8, 2008 11:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL
Sounds good to me. Thank you Andy! :)
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Andy Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gang -
I am hoping to pick this up where Matt left off and see if I can
provide a solution. There are two problems that I am hoping to
address:
1. High contrast content: Skin
+1
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:21 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 22:18 +0100, Matthias
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces
Congratulations Andrew!
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1..
Just kidding.. Congratulations Andrew.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Andrew Robinson.
Andrew is working on the
+1 your actual result [1] being different than the mockup [2]. I understand
the limitations and like your solution.
Thank you for your work!
Matt
I'm not sure where the code lives for maven-theme.css but there is a 10
pixel change that will fix an unnecessary horizontal scrollbar in Firefox
for pages like this one:
http://myfaces.apache.org/tobago/index.html
The style definition for #banner has width: 200px but contains an IMG that
has a
Hi Edward,
There is already an issue to create a Trinidad skin for this look and feel:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-979
Regards,
Matt
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward,
These are two different beasts. There was talk of making
Congratulations Scott!
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Scott O'Bryan.
Scott is working on the Apache MyFaces and Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite
Congratulations Simon!
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Simon Kitching.
Simon is working on the Apache MyFaces and Orchestra stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to
Great work Adonis,
My favorite is the top one.
Thank you,
Matt
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Adonis Raduca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't in my best creative disposition in the last period, so I made two
logos for Trinidad :)
What's your opinion ... about those logos ?
Mathias
Thank you Andy
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Andy Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang -
Just a heads up that I finally managed to get around to submitting a
patch for TRINIDAD-822. The solution is pretty much along the lines
that we discussed in this email thread. I did decide to
Thank you Adonis.
I think they all look great. I noticed there is one minor anomaly in
the Tomahawk logo on the far-left side, there's a portion of the green
logo that shows up as all gray whereas in the other logos, that kind
of area shows up green in the other logos.
My only request would be
Hi all,
The regex would be powerful though I'm afraid that it would not as
obvious or easy to use for non-technical designers/skinners.
I think something like this would be clearer:
@agent ie and (min-major-version: 6) and (min-minor-version: 1) and
(max-major-version: 6) {
/* styles for IE
may not be
enough. In a 3 part version (ie 2.0.10) the minor of 0 isn't helpful
if you want to do something based on the 10 value
-Andrew
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The regex would be powerful though I'm
to be
able to parse a lot of crap :)
-Andrew
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, full agent version matching is troublesome. With this approach:
@agent ie and (min-major-version: 6) and (min-minor-version: 1) and
(max-major-version: 6
+1 to option 5
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Andy Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, how about
option 5)
It does:
@agent ie and (min-version:5) and (max-version:7) {
/* styles for all 5.*, 6.*, and 7.* versions of the IE agent versions */
}
Regards,
Matt
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Glauco P. Gomes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 if this includes multiple major versions (5, 6, 7)
Glauco P.
Hey Andrew,
How about just using the CSS3 rounded corner styles already available
in Firefox and Safari? Of course we'd fall back into square corners
in IE.
-Matt
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the many of the renderers for Trinidad
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Andrew,
How about just using the CSS3 rounded corner styles already
available
in Firefox and Safari? Of course we'd fall back into square
corners
, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was referring to -foo-border-radius, etc. as seen here:
http://www.css3.info/preview/rounded-border/
That website is using only the proposed CSS3 syntax.
As far as shadows, I believe only Safari currently supports
+1
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Jeanne Waldman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 8/4/2008 7:54 AM PT:
+1
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.9 release of the Apache
+1
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.9 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed
Hi Catherine,
Here's how to access the source for the JSF 1.1 version of the code:
http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/source-repository.html
and its demo code is under:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-examples/trinidad-demo/src/main/
And for JSF 1.2:
There is no single component today that can provide this kind of layout.
However, I believe that you can achieve this with 2 consecutive
panelFormLayout components, e.g. something like this:
tr:panelFormLayout labelWidth=100
tr:inputText .../
/tr:panelFormLayout
tr:panelFormLayout
Hi Andy,
+1 to #2 -- I feel this makes the most sense. That browser can hardly
be considered a PDA-quality browser; our interpretation of what
desktop means seems to fit more with iPhone's browser.
Thanks,
Matt
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Andy Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks -
Thank you Andy,
It looks great. I've committed your patch in trunk, trunk_1.2.x, and
1.2.9.1-branch.
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Andy Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks All!
I have logged the following issue to track this requirement:
+1
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Andrew Robinson
Hi Adonis,
I can't seem to locate the non-bitmap version of the Apache MyFaces
Trinidad logo (e.g. a vector-based graphics file like PDF or
Illustrator).
Attached is the bitmap (png) version.
Thank you,
Matt
attachment: trinidad_logo.png
+1
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Gabrielle Crawford
gabrielle.crawf...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
Cagatay Civici wrote:
+1
On Feb 10, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the
+1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
@trunk_1.2.x - trunk:
+1
@andrew:
do you mean multiple 1.0.x branches in parallel?
-1 :-)
just one
+1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
2009/2/22 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
+1
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get
Hi all,
I've noticed lately that in order to build Trinidad, I have to use jdk6 on
the command line (though the settings.xml uses jdk5).
My ~/.m2/settings.xml has the following:
profiles
profile
idjava5.home/id
activation
activeByDefaulttrue/activeByDefault
+1
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
+1
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.12 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are
+1 to making the change and doing so in the central location
On a related note... There's a similar attribute that input components have
called readOnly. When this attribute is true, the component is more
interactive than when disabled is true. If a component is not disabled but
is readOnly,
Wow this looks fantastic, nice work!
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Catalin Kormos catalin.kor...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello there,
I have the pleasure to inform you about the work we did to develop a new
skin for Trinidad and based on this a brand new, Trinidad components
Rather than having the casablanca skin as a separate jar file, I would
prefer to see it built-into the Trinidad jars (part of the impl project) so
consumers could use it out-of-the-box without any extra jar configuration.
Regards,
Matt
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Catalin Kormos
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Matt Cooper mcoo...@apache.org wrote:
Rather than having the casablanca skin as a separate jar file, I would
prefer to see it built-into the Trinidad jars (part of the impl project
in?
-- Blake Sullivan
Matt Cooper (JIRA) said the following On 1/20/2010 2:09 PM PT:
Skinning framework support for skin versioning
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1691
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1691
customers to modify their
trinidad-config to use the new skin name in order to opt in?
-- Blake Sullivan
Matt Cooper (JIRA) said the following On 1/20/2010 2:09 PM PT:
Skinning framework support for skin versioning
--
Key
. However, the addition of inclusion support would presumably make any
refactoring for sharing easy to take advantge of.
-- Blake Sullivan
Matt Cooper said the following On 1/20/2010 3:35 PM PT:
If the application developer is injecting a skin addition into skin A and
if skin B (aka version 2
Is the trinidad-2.0.x branch something permanent or do you foresee this
being rebranched from the JSF 1.2 Trinidad trunk in the future?
(I am asking because I am applying patches for TRINIDAD-1696 and would like
to know if I need an extra patch for the trinidad-2.0.x branch.)
Thanks,
Matt
Excellent, thank you Matthias :)
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
Hey Matt,
please do NOT apply them to 2.0.x
every n weeks, I do merge the 1.2 fixes into the 2.0.x
-Matthias
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Matt Cooper mcoo...@apache.org
Performing a mvn install on Trinidad's
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk appears to require a
mvn install on trinidad-maven/branches/2.0.x-branch.
It seems that a more natural pair would be simply trinidad-maven/trunk for
Trinidad's trunk.
Is this
+1 -- Since Trinidad does not support IE4, IE5, nor Netscape:
http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-1_2/release-notes.html
then this should be just fine.
Thanks,
Matt
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jeanne Waldman
jeanne.wald...@oracle.comwrote:
Hi,
While working on the enhancement to
attributes should be tag children of the document
tag and should not require the use of a tr:group.
-- Blake Sullivan
On 9/29/10 4:30 PM, Matt Cooper (JIRA) wrote:
Ability to easily create a meta tag
---
Key: TRINIDAD-1930
from (in fact as part of handling exactly this
problem, outputting meta tags for mobile devices, in that case for Palm)
-- Blake Sullivan
On 10/4/10 9:41 AM, Matt Cooper wrote:
Hi Blake,
How would you recommend exposing the configuration of the viewport metadata
since it is agent-specific
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
I've created a Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-1 release candidate, with the
following artifacts
up for a vote:
SVN source
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jeanne Waldman
jeanne.wald...@oracle.comwrote:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote, On 1/10/2011 8:28 AM PT:
Hi,
I've created a Trinidad 1.2.14 release candidate, with the following
artifacts
up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1057250):
+1
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
+1
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, MAX STARETS max.star...@oracle.com
wrote:
+1
On 2/16/2011 9:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which
+1
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0 release out and
now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have
committed the recent submitted patches available for this
+1
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 08/03/2011 03:43 PM, Max Starets wrote:
+1
On 8/3/2011 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.6released and now I need a
I'm okay with genericDesktop.
Perhaps this isn't a concern but I wonder if there is any value in giving
any sort of time scale for this, e.g. genericDesktop2010 or
genericDesktopHtml4, etc. as I presume in 2020 it'll be (I really hope
so) nearly impossible to find an HTML display engine that
of Safari were no longer setting
the lower bar of capability, the capabilities would increase.
-- Blake Sullivan
On 9/27/11 11:32 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
-1 to timescale. In my experience, things that REQUIRE maintenance do not
work well in OS..
Scott
On 09/27/2011 12:28 PM, Matt
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Dave Robinson drmaill...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v. 2.0.7
released and now I need a vote as to
Done: 1230628.
Thank you,
Matt
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Anand Nath anand.v.n...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
Can someone review and commit the patch uploaded to TRINIDAD-1041 to
1.2.12.6.2 branch?
Thanks
Anand
+1
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.comwrote:
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
On Feb 25, 2012, at 3:36 AM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
+1.
Thanks for putting this together Scott.
Andy
On Feb 24, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
+1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:42 AM, gabrielle.crawf...@oracle.com wrote:
+1
On Mar 25, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Currently the Trinidad Trunk is set to JSF 2.0. There have been a
number of blocker bugs recently (namely some issues with the
Maybe we just need to ask the spammers who keep adding pages to our wiki ;)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Grant Smith gr...@marathonpm.com wrote:
Udo,
I tried to do that a few months ago. Do we have documentation somewhere on
how to update the homepage ?
Thanks,
-Grant.
On Tue, Mar
Thank you Mike for getting this going!
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.comwrote:
I've requested Infra to help us make this happen.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6191
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
