good stuff!
PS: the JDO TCK is also available via Apache.
-Matthias
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
For those of you unfamiliar with the portlet-bridge project, it is
essentially the R.I. implementation of JSR-301 and JSR-328. For
Hello Scott,
Great news! I think you guys made an excellent decision.
---
Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter:
jsfcentral
+1
Leonardo,
This is a good question and I'm not entirely sure on it myself. I did ask
Mike Freedman about it off line as he did the bulk of the code for the TCK
and he said it wasn't applicable.
I'm going to hold off on the vote until we get an answer from Mike on this
issue. Mike, can you
Short answer is I don't think its necessary, though if MyFaces wanted to
make adjustments it would expand the reach of these tests. In the end,
I couldn't figure out a JSF spec compliant way to write these tests and
hence they are excluded however because I did figure out a way that
worked
Future implementations could supply Mock Objects test this, maybe even using
he myfaces testing framework. While he TCK is flexible enough to test
JSF/Bridge combinations, providing mock objects for these tests might allow
us to make sure the delegation on the Bridge that is being tested is
Hi Scott,
great news ;)
best regards,
Martin
On 6/23/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
That's cool!. Any plans for jsf 2.0 + portlets?
regards,
Leonardo
2010/6/22 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Hello everyone,
For those of you unfamiliar with the portlet-bridge
Hi
Ok, good to know that. Looking into the tck I saw this comment:
.Render Policy tests are excluded because its mechanism relies on a
Mojarra impl dependency (doesn't work on MyFaces)
If you are testing with Mojarra uncomment these out to get the
additional test apps built
My
Hello everyone,
For those of you unfamiliar with the portlet-bridge project, it is
essentially the R.I. implementation of JSR-301 and JSR-328. For over a
year some core people have been working on getting the R.I. up to par.
The one piece that was missing from this was the TCK.
Well,
Hi
That's cool!. Any plans for jsf 2.0 + portlets?
regards,
Leonardo
2010/6/22 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Hello everyone,
For those of you unfamiliar with the portlet-bridge project, it is
essentially the R.I. implementation of JSR-301 and JSR-328. For over a year
some core
