Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-23 Thread Manfred Geiler
BTW, thanks Matthias for the successful 1.2 release. Good to know that someone keeps the business running while oneself is lying in the sun beeing on vacation... ;-) Regarding the repo structure. We had some discussions before. One proposal was the follwing structure. And AFAIR there where no

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-23 Thread Paul Spencer
Manfred, +1 for the following! /branches /branches/1_1_6 /branches/1_2_1 /tags /tags/1_1_2 /tags/1_1_3 /tags/1_1_4 /tags/1_1_5 /tags/1_2_0 /tags/1_2_1 /1_1_x --- the trunk for JSF 1.1 development /1_2_x --- the trunk for JSF 1.2 development Are their any changes

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
/branches /branches/1_1_6 /branches/1_2_1 /tags /tags/1_1_2 /tags/1_1_3 /tags/1_1_4 /tags/1_1_5 /tags/1_2_0 /tags/1_2_1 /1_1_x --- the trunk for JSF 1.1 development /1_2_x --- the trunk for JSF 1.2 development I like that tomcat style. -M The great advantage: We can do

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-23 Thread Grant Smith
+1 On 7/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /branches /branches/1_1_6 /branches/1_2_1 /tags /tags/1_1_2 /tags/1_1_3 /tags/1_1_4 /tags/1_1_5 /tags/1_2_0 /tags/1_2_1 /1_1_x --- the trunk for JSF 1.1 development /1_2_x --- the trunk for JSF 1.2

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-21 Thread Paul Spencer
I do not like the idea of current (symlink to jsf1.2). To me JSF 1.1 and 1.2 are two products and should be treated as such. Paul Spencer Andrew Robinson wrote: Not to be too anal, but would: current (symlink to jsf1.2) jsf1.1 jsf1.2 Be a little more tidy? It should also consider the web

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Cagatay Civici
About subprojects, I think the case is same for them, if we make 1.2 the trunk for api, why not set 1.2 branches of subprojects as trunks too? Also after doing it, we may need to reconfigure current and current12 too. On 7/19/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assuming MyFaces 1.1.7 is

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Adam Winer
Why not: how many users are ready to make the jump to JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are on JSP 2.0 or earlier. It'd make my life way easier if the Trinidad trunk were 1.2, definitely, I just doubt that would hold true for the users. Just for starters, what about the

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Matt Cooper
+1 (non-binding) On 7/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not: how many users are ready to make the jump to JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are on JSP 2.0 or earlier. It'd make my life way easier if the Trinidad trunk were 1.2, definitely, I just doubt

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Cagatay Civici
Why not: how many users are ready to make the jump to JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are on JSP 2.0 or earlier. Yeah, but we're just making 1.2 the trunk, not forcing people to use 1.2. Again two active branches current11 and current12 sounds good to me, where

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Andrew Robinson
Not to be too anal, but would: current (symlink to jsf1.2) jsf1.1 jsf1.2 Be a little more tidy? It should also consider the web site right? Right now, it only shows the current/trunk branch. Perhaps the site should be versioned as well. Example using tomahawk:

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Danny Robinson
Likewise, although we don't use jsp so considering pusing to JSF 1.2 + Facelets to get there sooner. +0 right now. On 7/20/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this point all of my project are based on JSF 1.1, primarily because the infrastructure to support JSF 1.2 is not available

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Paul Spencer
I do not like the idea of current (symlink to jsf1.2). To me JSF 1.1 and 1.2 are two products and should be treated as such. Paul Spencer Andrew Robinson wrote: Not to be too anal, but would: current (symlink to jsf1.2) jsf1.1 jsf1.2 Be a little more tidy? It should also consider the web

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-20 Thread Paul Spencer
At this point all of my project are based on JSF 1.1, primarily because the infrastructure to support JSF 1.2 is not available on the deployment platforms. Paul Spencer Adam Winer wrote: Why not: how many users are ready to make the jump to JSF 1.2? Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad,

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
[X] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk [ ] +0 [ ] -1 and why.. -M -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail:

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Paul McMahan
+1 On Jul 19, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to become the current trunk. Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch (1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is the current version). Please cast your vote

[VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to become the current trunk. Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch (1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is the current version). Please cast your vote [ ] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Bruno Aranda
+1 On 19/07/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to become the current trunk. Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch (1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is the current version). Please cast your vote

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Simon Lessard
[x] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk On 7/19/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 19/07/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to become the current trunk.

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Martin Marinschek
+1, regards, Martin On 7/19/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [x] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk On 7/19/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 19/07/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, this is a vote for

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Adam had some points, regarding the other subprojects. What happens to them, since making JSF1.2 trunk is easy, but how do other subprojects handle this. Let's rethink this :-) On 7/19/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1, regards, Martin On 7/19/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Dennis Byrne
+1 On 7/19/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1, regards, Martin On 7/19/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [x] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk On 7/19/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 19/07/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Werner Punz
+1 we have 2007 Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to become the current trunk. Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch (1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is the current version). Please cast your vote

Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk

2007-07-19 Thread Andrew Robinson
+1 On 7/19/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 we have 2007 Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hi, this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts by our group to become the current trunk. Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch (1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is the current version). Please