Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Dec 1, 2007 1:06 PM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 2007/12/1, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am fine with that, just, I'd change the name commons for validators/converters/fileupload /commons/ -/myfaces-validators -... +1 done Regards,

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Bruno Aranda
What about myfaces-extra-validators... etc... Cheers, Bruno On 01/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007 1:06 PM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 2007/12/1, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am fine with that, just, I'd change the name

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Bruno Aranda
Anyway, that is ok for me :) Thanks, Bruno On 01/12/2007, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 2007/12/1, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am fine with that, just, I'd change the name commons for validators/converters/fileupload /commons/ -/myfaces-validators

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I am fine with that, just, I'd change the name commons for validators/converters/fileupload /commons/ -/myfaces-validators -... or what ? I thought more about /commons/ -/myfaces-commons-utils /newprojectname/ -/myfaces-newprojectname-validators

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Bruno Aranda
Yes, I would say, just go for it. I think we need to setup this the sooner the better to keep going... Bruno On 01/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1 myfaces-converters is more natural, I think On Dec 1, 2007 1:16 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
-1 myfaces-converters is more natural, I think On Dec 1, 2007 1:16 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about myfaces-extra-validators... etc... Cheers, Bruno On 01/12/2007, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 1, 2007 1:06 PM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I thought more about /commons/ -/myfaces-commons-utils /newprojectname/ -/myfaces-newprojectname-validators -/myfaces-newprojectname-converters -/myfaces-newprojectname-ppr -/myfaces-newprojectname-grids -/myfaces-newprojectname-layouters no real need for a new project name, IMO

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I thought more about /commons/ -/myfaces-commons-utils /newprojectname/ -/myfaces-newprojectname-validators -/myfaces-newprojectname-converters -/myfaces-newprojectname-ppr -/myfaces-newprojectname-grids -/myfaces-newprojectname-layouters what about creme as the new name ? :-) We

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Please notice that newprojectname ist not located under commons! The question is, what makes the result of the fission ;-) of tomahawk and trinidad more common than any other project. Why should it deserve the name commons? looks like, we start all under commons now; we can always move it.

Re: [commons] structure proposal...

2007-12-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
once more... to make it clear; this all is not! final, we can remove/delete/move_it_to_codehaus :-) every time ;-) Just a proof of concept. Thx, Matthias On Dec 1, 2007 2:08 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please notice that newprojectname ist not located under commons! The