Subject: Re: [site] preferred doc format for website
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgTo: MyFaces
Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
-1 on APT
+1 on XML
On Dec 15, 2007 3:29 PM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm experimenting with some changes
On Dec 15, 2007 7:29 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experimenting with some changes to the myfaces site.
I see that there are some files in maven APT format, and some in XDOC. Which
is the preferred format for files?
In particular, I'd like to split docs into versions that
still drunken seems like. sorry for the noise.
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 3:58 pm
Subject: Re: [site] preferred doc format for website
To: Reply-MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.orgReply-To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED
+1 on apt
-1 on xdoc
APT is *much* easier to write.
Why do we have to choose one? As long as the author is writing
documentation, we should be happy right?
-Andrew
On Dec 15, 2007 7:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 on APT
+1 on XML
On Dec 15, 2007 3:29 PM, Simon
I personally like the APT format.
However
+1 on both formats (the author chooses)
--Manfred
On 12/15/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on apt
-1 on xdoc
APT is *much* easier to write.
Why do we have to choose one? As long as the author is writing
documentation, we should be
