Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?

2007-05-17 Thread Grant Smith
I would definitely be in favor of this. It would be great to see how you automate the TCK runs, and how the results are reported. On 5/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the Geronimo project. The automation framework

Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?

2007-05-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
that sounds cool On 5/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the Geronimo project. The automation framework produces very detailed reports and graphs broken down by component, one of those components being JSF. The

Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?

2007-05-17 Thread Dennis Byrne
Thanks Paul. This would be great. Dennis Byrne On 5/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the Geronimo project. The automation framework produces very detailed reports and graphs broken down by component, one of those

Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?

2007-05-16 Thread Grant Smith
Would it be feasible to have a Continuum task that runs the TCK against the current build ? Then we'd know if anything we've done has broken TCK compliance. Is our zone even powerful enough to run the TCK ? I seem to remember it being a huge memory and resource hog. Of course, the other aspect to