Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hi! I found the problem. I requested the to-be-decorated application within my constructor which failed as with an JSF 1.1. compiled class the FacesContext is required to find the JSF 1.2 default application implementation. JSF 1.2 will then dispatch the new methods to the default

Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hello Mario, Comments inline. On 9/6/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I found the problem. I requested the to-be-decorated application within my constructor which failed as with an JSF 1.1. compiled class the FacesContext is required to find the JSF 1.2 default

Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hi Simon! I guess you could use a ServletContextListener to extract the default factory from FactoryFinder and then set your own instance passing it the default implementation, but that would work only if JSF's own ServletContextListener is executed before, and I'm not aware of the listener

JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hi! Is the JSF 1.2 API backward compatible? An application developed with the JSF 1.2 API should run on 1.1 as long as no 1.2 specific stuff will be used, no? I ask as I had a UOE in orchestra which seems happened after I override the ApplicationFactory (and the Application) but still use JSF

Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

JSF 1.2API, I guess the application should run on a JSF 1.1 server. Regards, ~ Simon On 9/5/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Is the JSF 1.2 API backward compatible? An application developed with the JSF 1.2 API should run on 1.1 as long as no 1.2 specific stuff

Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hi! It's the opposite, as for any backward compatible system. It means that you can, theoretically, run a JSF 1.1 application on a 1.2 system. I haven't looked at it in very detail, but it seems if you provide your own javax.faces.application.Application compiled with JSF1.1 the method

Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hello Mario, On 9/5/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! It's the opposite, as for any backward compatible system. It means that you can, theoretically, run a JSF 1.1 application on a 1.2 system. I haven't looked at it in very detail, but it seems if you provide your own

Re: JSF 1.2 API backward compatible?

Hi! This is, indeed, a compatibility issue. However, I assume it's caused because you did not use the decorator pattern when you applied your custom Application implementation, so now you're inheriting from the default implementation method behavior, which is to throw an