Hi Matthias and all,
Yes I could add it to a wiki, but I think I'll have to revisit what will be
required per alpha release as I'm currently implementing latest spec
snapshot on the MyFaces base (cannot commit it yet since it's not public
though) and there are more change on that version than
Hi
The list is fine. I'll be happy to help with 2.0 as soon as the code is
committed.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Matthias and all,
Yes I could add it to a wiki, but I think I'll have to revisit what will be
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com schrieb:
I'm currently working on the annotation processing stuff (@ManagedBean,
@ManagedProperty...). Already made a first attempt for the managed
beans, but there is still some work to do (converters, components, event
listeners, etc). I hope I can apply the same
I got a response back from our legal, and any usage of the TCK must be
appropriately related to IBM products. So you're right that we can't
share results. Sorry for any misunderstanding on that.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com
Yes, that's for sharing details, e.g. stack trace on failure (from the TCK).
That doesn't mean you can't submit a descriptive jira ticket ;-)
-Matthias
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote:
I got a response back from our legal, and any usage of the TCK must
Hi Matthias,
I guess that's a fair point about alpha release, I'll try to think of some
good milestone.
~ Simon
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Simon Lessard
simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm currently working on the annotation processing stuff (@ManagedBean,
@ManagedProperty...). Already made a first attempt for the managed beans,
but there is still some work to do (converters, components, event
listeners, etc). I hope I can apply the same logic for those other
components
About Shale-test, is it right to use Shale classes in MyFaces Core? Of
course it's just the unit tests, but in some way it's still a cyclic
dependency which is usually a bad thing...
but you don't relay on the testing framework for runtime.
So, yes using shale to fire the unit tests is valid.
Thanks for the responses so far. Comments in-line (in blue text).
Simon Lessard wrote:
Hi Matthias,
I guess that's a fair point about alpha release, I'll try to think of
some good milestone.
~ Simon
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org
Not sure what you mean by combing a committer. As far as the TCK is
whoops. Typo... becoming :-)
concerned though, we will have immediate access to the TCK at IBM once Sun
releases it. We'd be happy to run any alpha, beta and eventually final
releases of MyFaces 2.0 through the tck and
Good point about the size of the facelets work. Simon, is there part of
the facelets work that we could pick up for you guys? We're looking to
help out where our efforts would be most useful instead of just grabbing
random issues to work on.
I agree for the most part about your proposed
Hi Micheal,
Help on Facelets would be most welcome, it's quite big and not a code base I
know that much. I can see 6 main tasks to that integration, 4 required and 2
nice to have:
1. Relink the classes to JSF 2.0 FaceletContext and other Facelets API
from myfaces-api. *100%* done.
2.
Simon,
can you add that content to a wiki ?
-Matthias
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Simon Lessard
simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Micheal,
Help on Facelets would be most welcome, it's quite big and not a code base I
know that much. I can see 6 main tasks to that integration, 4
I'll have to check on what the deal is with the tck results. I'm not
sure what our current license conditions are with Sun (not my area of
expertise). I'll let you know what I find out from our legal team.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Not sure what you mean by combing a committer. As far as
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll have to check on what the deal is with the tck results. I'm not sure
what our current license conditions are with Sun (not my area of
expertise). I'll let you know what I find out from our legal team.
cool. There
facelets work that we could pick up for you guys? We're looking to help out
As for you team... I'd recommend to sign and fax the Individual
Contributor License Agreement (if you haven't done
so already), see [1]. If you have an intellectual property agreement
with your employer, they may also
We already have taken care of the legal stuff. We had actually hoped to
get involved in the 2.0 work much earlier but got stalled out waiting on
legal in the fall. We're good to go on that now.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
facelets work that we could pick up for you guys? We're looking to
Hi
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Simon Lessard
simon.lessar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
See inline.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the JSF 2.0 spec is getting closer to completion, I think it
would be a good
Now that the JSF 2.0 spec is getting closer to completion, I think it
would be a good idea for some more planning to go into the development
process for the MyFaces 2.0 release going forward. There are several
aspects of this that need to be addressed.
First, regarding the changes/additions
Hi Michael,
See inline.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the JSF 2.0 spec is getting closer to completion, I think it
would be a good idea for some more planning to go into the development
process for the MyFaces 2.0
20 matches
Mail list logo
