!
http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans
Wessendorf
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 6:29 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
So,
any
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED
Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias
!
http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL
*
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1 for 1.2
. ;-)
With kind regards,
Marco Beelen
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Aranda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 22 mei 2007 15:13
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
Ok, I see your points of having a more flexible versioning
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler
*
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
So
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release
plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
+1 for 1.2 as well, MyFaces 2.0 for JSF 1.2 and MyFaces 3.0 for JSF
2.0sounds just strange to me.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 5/18/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community
members that way and keeps it aligned
+1 for 1.2, based on the advantages of aligning with spec releases.
Best wishes,
Paul
On May 18, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Zubin Wadia wrote:
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-
community members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec
releases.
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x
and I am
+1 for JSF 2.0 (or JSF6
let's hope they don't call the next JSF JSF 6 (based on Java EE 6)
But, that would mean, we can jump from 1.2 = 6.
Not to bad! :-))
-M
On 5/17/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2 as well, MyFaces 2.0 for JSF 1.2 and MyFaces 3.0 for JSF 2.0
sounds just strange to me.
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias
newsletter!
http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
- JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
* Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter!
http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1
=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
for the JSF Central newsletter!
http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 *
From: Grant Smith [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 1:16 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces 2.0.0 (was Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?)
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x
and I am
+1 for JSF 2.0 (or JSF6 or whatever) - MyFaces 3.x
--Manfred
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community
members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec releases.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07,
+1 for JSF 1.2 . It's more intuitive.
Dennis Byrne
On 5/17/07, Zubin Wadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community
members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec releases.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/18/07, Matthias
I am still +1 for
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x
Paul Spencer
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 -
Did you mean for that to go to the list ? :)
On 5/17/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still +1 for
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x
Paul Spencer
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler
Whoops. It *was* to the list.
On 5/17/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you mean for that to go to the list ? :)
On 5/17/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still +1 for
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x
Paul Spencer
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community
members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec releases.
+1
31 matches
Mail list logo
