I have commented it out, again
(see vote thread for more information)
-M
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, I totally agree with Bernd.. Releases have VERSION numbers. It's
snapshots that need revision and I see no harm either way.
On Feb 11,
Hi,
i agree to Bernd, the revision number for a release is not needed, but
what is the Problem having this few more lines in any manifest?
I would prefer having this info packaged.
Regards,
Volker
2011/2/10 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com:
Hello Matthias,
For a release the
hi,
+1 for adding the revision number in any case.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/11 Volker Weber v.we...@inexso.de
Hi,
i agree to Bernd, the
+1, I totally agree with Bernd.. Releases have VERSION numbers. It's
snapshots that need revision and I see no harm either way.
On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
+1 for adding the revision number in any case.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Hello Matthias,
For a release the revision number is not needed. For a snapshot it might be
helpful if someone reports a bug and it's not clear with revision was the
base for the snapshot.
Regards
Bernd
Am 10.02.2011 19:23 schrieb Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org:
Having the actual
