On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Sean Schofield wrote:
I beg to differ. You are interpreting the word extensions too narrowly.
Adding components over and above those that are part of the spec is most
definitely *extending* the set of available components. So extensions is
a perfectly appropriate name.
As for Bijou, if this is supposed to be french, it must always be written with an x : Bijoux, whether singular or plural.
As far as I'm concerned, my choice would also go for a simple 'Apache Faces Extensions'.
Sylvain.
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 22:47 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
I'll assume
Dooh, of course,
where is my french ;)
regards,
Martin
On 6/6/05, Sylvain Vieujot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for Bijou, if this is supposed to be french, it must always be written
with an x : Bijoux, whether singular or plural.
As far as I'm concerned, my choice would also go for a
Incorporating the latest feedback:
the Apache Tomahawk Faces Extensions project
the Apache Appaloosa Faces Extensions project - short name: Apache loosa :-)
the Apache Mocassin(s) Faces Extensions project
the Apache Lonewolf Faces Extensions project
the Apache Windeyes Faces Extensions
-Original Message-
bijou - pronounced bezhoo
Definition:
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?
view=dictfield-12668446=bijoubranch=13842570textsearchtype=exactsort
order=score%2Cname
or
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bijou
Etymology:
short summary again (so that we don't loose anything):
the Apache Tomahawk Faces Extensions project
the Apache Appaloosa Faces Extensions project - short name: Apache loosa :-)
the Apache Mocassin(s) Faces Extensions project
the Apache Lonewolf Faces Extensions project
the Apache Windeyes
Thanks Martin!
I would actually prefer if we put the code word first;
Bijou - Apache Faces Extensions project
etc.
Just my $0.02 worth and thanks again for putting all the proposals
together in one place.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Jun 5, 2005, at 5:54 AM, Martin Marinschek wrote:
short summary
Well, we will need to put the Apache in front of the code-name, I
would think (like in all other Apache projects, at least I don't know
an exception?)
regards,
Martin
On 6/6/05, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Martin!
I would actually prefer if we put the code word first;
Incorporating the latest feedback:
the Apache Tomahawk Faces Extensions project
the Apache Appaloosa Faces Extensions project - short name: Apache loosa :-)
the Apache Mocassin(s) Faces Extensions project
the Apache Lonewolf Faces Extensions project
the Apache Windeyes Faces Extensions
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:45 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Suggested codenames for new components subproject
perhaps
Apache Faces Jewel
?
Sounds catchy for non native speakers at least. ;-)
Thoughts
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suggested codenames for new components subproject
You might want to take a look at the editor's note here:
http://people.apache.org/~craigmcc/struts-shale-README.html
for an explanation of why Shale
Same for me.
+1 for Apache Faces Extensions
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 09:11 -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
I like this one best of all, actually.
Can't tell you how much time I've spent making fun of jakarta
projects based on their stupid names -- just looking at the
subprojects now: Cactus, Slide,
Oh my,
I wonder where we will end up with this discussion!
I like Matt's Appaloosa, but if I leave out the Appa, loosa does not
sound too great in my ears ;)
What about coming down to what the components are really about - being
modules, you are able to stack them together and create new
2005/5/31, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh my,
I wonder where we will end up with this discussion!
That's what marketing departments are doing the whole day long, isn't
it? Well, we do not have a marketing department. So, let's collect
some further ideas. At the same time let's do not
Hej, cool. Would be a nice explanation for the FAQ section Why is the
components/goodies subproject called ... ?
What about this one:
MOre Cool Additional Stuff that Saves paIN
:-)
-Manfred
2005/5/31, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
a MOCASSIN is a nice additional feature if you
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Manfred Geiler wrote:
2005/5/31, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oh my,
I wonder where we will end up with this discussion!
That's what marketing departments are doing the whole day long, isn't
it? Well, we do not have a marketing department. So, let's collect
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Manfred Geiler wrote:
Hej, cool. Would be a nice explanation for the FAQ section Why is the
components/goodies subproject called ... ?
What about this one:
MOre Cool Additional Stuff that Saves paIN
Except the spelling is moccasin, not mocassin...
--
Martin Cooper
Since a few of the developers don't like tomahawk :-( I wanted to
start a thread for name / code-name ideas for a components + goodies
subproject. I don't have any ideas offhand but lets get a list
together and pick one.
I know Manfred had a few suggestions when we last discussed this ...
sean
I like tomahawk...
as long as it is buried in the backyard, and therefore stands as a
symbol for peace ;)
regards,
Martin
On 5/30/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since a few of the developers don't like tomahawk :-( I wanted to
start a thread for name / code-name ideas for a
Manfred suggested also mocassins ;)
Yes!
These boots are made for walking...
:-)
Did a search for some apache sites (the native american not the open
source foundation.) Found an interesting name:
Lonewolf
Might be appropriate b/c it can run standalone from MyFaces implementation.
Just a thought (still like tomahawk though.)
sean
On 5/30/05, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL
On 5/30/05, Matt Blum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a boring name like components would be much more meaningful than
a cool name like tomahawk.
We need a balance between boring and cool that both captures
attention, yet remains informative.
How about Tomahawk Faces Extensions as the
IMO there is nothing wrong with a code name for a subproject. Look no
further than the shale subproject. Its a lot easier to refer to that
subproject as shale then to accurately capture that project with a
meaningful one word name.
If we picked a codename that had some meaning behind it as well
I've been thinking all the afternoon-evening (GMT+1) in a meaningful
name. I've been trying to think on something that has to do with
'faces' and that sounded like an indian name. First, I thought of
'hairs' (which are faces 'extensions'), but did not sound poetic...
Then I thought of another
You might want to take a look at the editor's note here:
http://people.apache.org/~craigmcc/struts-shale-README.html
for an explanation of why Shale was chosen for that project.
I remember Craig's reasoning. My point is that shale is a catchy
name. A lot easier way to identify the
You make some good points. Still, tomahawk does have some
negative connotations. How about Appaloosa, after the breed of
horse, which was originally bred by the Nez Perce tribe, and helped
them to prosper?
-MattOn 5/30/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to take a look at
26 matches
Mail list logo
