a lot of stuff is moving around, and
this for compatibility reasons. I believe this will be for the best of
everyone in the end, but currently it's all a major mess.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomahawk-status--tf2340567.html#a7241793
Sent from the My Faces - Dev
Hi,
@Thomas - the changes you have introduced will affect one thing, and
that's back-button on server-side state saving. I do believe this is
important enough to release a new core as well.
@Wendy: I've commented on TOMAHAWK-713 - I currently don't see why
this is failing, I hope Jeff will
Please note: We need to release MyFaces Core 1.1.5 before MyFaces
Tomahawk 1.1.5.
The jsf_sequence is now rendered by the HtmlResponseStateManager when
using server side state saving. Before the tomahawk HtmlForm rendered
this parameter, which was incompatible to Sun RI and Trinidad.
-Thomas
good point,
let's get that guy out first
On 10/9/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note: We need to release MyFaces Core 1.1.5 before MyFaces
Tomahawk 1.1.5.
The jsf_sequence is now rendered by the HtmlResponseStateManager when
using server side state saving. Before the
On 10/9/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note: We need to release MyFaces Core 1.1.5 before MyFaces
Tomahawk 1.1.5.
I was actually talking about Tomahawk 1.1.4. In any case, both core
and tomahawk will need to be released again and I don't think the
order matters too much.
The order is important. We will need to release core before tomahawk.
On 10/9/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/9/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please note: We need to release MyFaces Core 1.1.5 before MyFaces
Tomahawk 1.1.5.
I was actually talking about Tomahawk
On 10/9/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The order is important. We will need to release core before tomahawk.
Fine, but that wasn't the important question. :)
I know we're breaking compatibility somewhere because of the
JavaScript changes, but I'm not sure exactly where the break
On 9/26/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to fix one final little thing in JavaScript generation -
I'll hurry up, I promise.
Martin, can we get an update?
If it's not a huge change, it might make sense to go ahead and branch
so that Werner can proceed with his
Where are we with re-branching for Tomahawk 1.1.4?
Please don't take this as hurry up, already! because I have plenty
to keep me busy. :)
I just want to make sure that no one is waiting for me... because I'm
waiting for word that all (or most) of the changes are in.
--
Wendy
Wendy Smoak schrieb:
Where are we with re-branching for Tomahawk 1.1.4?
Please don't take this as hurry up, already! because I have plenty
to keep me busy. :)
I just want to make sure that no one is waiting for me... because I'm
waiting for word that all (or most) of the changes are in.
Everyone is waiting for me, I know ;)
I just wanted to fix one final little thing in JavaScript generation -
I'll hurry up, I promise.
regards,
Martin
On 9/26/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak schrieb:
Where are we with re-branching for Tomahawk 1.1.4?
Please don't take
11 matches
Mail list logo
