Hi!
I'd like to make the following two enhancements to the tomahawk
datatable/column:
1) add a new attribute groupByValue to the column
This allows to configure a valueBinding to be used as value to check if
there is a group change instead of scanning the children.
The old behavior still works,
No, sounds good to me.
regards,
Martin
On 5/21/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to make the following two enhancements to the tomahawk
datatable/column:
1) add a new attribute groupByValue to the column
This allows to configure a valueBinding to be used as value to
Hi,
i don't think either of suggestions are right.
Sugesstion 1 has disadvatage:
if you change one property of children in group, which is not defined as
groupByValue or
taken in account when computing value of checking value,
you don't get whole group as changed.
Suggestion 2 has
Hi Zdenek,
ad 1 - that's exactly what Mario wants to do - he wants to make sure
that the group doesn't change if only an attribute, but not the id
changes.
ad 2 - why does sorting have anything to do with the grouping functionality?
regards,
Martin
On 5/21/07, Zdeněk Sochor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Sugesstion 1 has disadvatage:
if you change one property of children in group, which is not defined
as groupByValue or
taken in account when computing value of checking value,
you don't get whole group as changed.
Notice, this change is backward compatible, so if you do NOT use
Mario,
I am already thinking of places to use the enhancements.
+1 - add a new attribute groupByValue to the column
+1 - use objects instead of StringBuffer to create the compare string
Paul Spencer
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to make the following two enhancements to the tomahawk
