Werner,
An implied restriction would be only 1 version of DoJo per webapp.
Backward compatibility is my main concern. I will upgrade to the latest
DoJo in implement in Tomahawk, but it will be the entire application not
a page at a time.
Paul Spencer
My application is using the Dojo in
Werner,
I am excited to see you are planning to upgrade the DoJo support. I
would like to see support for multiple versions, including the one
currently in Tomahawk. The desired version to use for any project should
be configurable.
Paul Spencer
Werner Punz wrote:
hello everyone
I just
Paul Spencer schrieb:
Werner,
I am excited to see you are planning to upgrade the DoJo support. I
would like to see support for multiple versions, including the one
currently in Tomahawk. The desired version to use for any project should
be configurable.
Hello Paul first thanks for the
Paul Spencer schrieb:
Werner,
I am excited to see you are planning to upgrade the DoJo support. I
would like to see support for multiple versions, including the one
currently in Tomahawk. The desired version to use for any project should
be configurable.
Ah Paul sorry for the second
hello everyone
I just wanted to drop a short note, start a discussion here.
I was busy the last few weeks regarding dojo after getting weblets 1.0
out of the door.
Well here is a plan. As you all know we currently have dojo in Tomahawk,
well the main issue is, this is a huge dependency.
I
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello everyone
I just wanted to drop a short note, start a discussion here.
I was busy the last few weeks regarding dojo after getting weblets 1.0 out
of the door.
Well here is a plan. As you all know we currently have
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
I would like to see how tomahawk directory looks like after the
modification, only to take this into account. One question is if dojo
components should be 1.1 or 1.2 compatible (the difference is on the
generation of component and tag classes), or both.
Well for
