I'm not sure about the name for the component - you want to reuse the
logo for the component?
Just an idea. We don't need to.
I think it should only express what the
component is about, not what it's for...
Ok, so what about: dynaForm
In fact, thats the class name of the component already.
sounds good.
regards,
Martin
On 10/12/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure about the name for the component - you want to reuse the
logo for the component?
Just an idea. We don't need to.
I think it should only express what the
component is about, not what it's
Hi!
As some of you might know I've developed Faces Freeway [1].
Well, I don't want to say that this project failed, but - beside - its
hard to maintain a documentation, it is also hard to provide a nice
looking, always working fully fledged simple way to the persistence
framework e.g. hibernate.
Hi!
Well, I don't want to say that this project failed
Forgot to mention: We already use it in our application.
---
Mario
Hi MarioI think this sound pretty much like rubby on railsI don't know about other developersbut I think some people like this kind of components for making rapid web sitesome people hate these kind of components because the code is doings lots of thing implicitly and the code is not showing those
Hi Mario,
sounds nice - a lot easier than with the cross-data-table. So Faces
Freeway is officially declared dead? What a pity...
regards,
Martin
On 10/11/06, Arash Rajaeeyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mario
I think this sound pretty much like rubby on rails
I don't know about other
Hi Martin!
So Faces
Freeway is officially declared dead? What a pity...
Na, I don't think so. As I said, we use it and my boss is happy with it
as it allows him to do some simple table-editing-data pages.
But I often want to use just the GUI Builder without any automatic
persistence in the
Hi!
So Faces
Freeway is officially declared dead? What a pity...
Na, I don't think so.
The name of the component could also be: freewayGui
Then we can reuse the logo we already have.
Ciao,
Mario
Ok, that's good to hear. Slimming down generators is always a good idea.
I'm not sure about the name for the component - you want to reuse the
logo for the component? I think it should only express what the
component is about, not what it's for...
regards,
Martin
On 10/12/06, Mario Ivankovits