shared discuss again [was Re: JspStateManagerImpl into shared?]

2008-04-02 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Mario, you are not alone in hating the shared concept. ;-) Good! 1) has a super stable API That is true, that might be the hardest part. 2) is used (ie. shared) by the myfaces core(!) as well as other myfaces projects Sure! 3) may be used by the experienced JSF app

Re: shared discuss again [was Re: JspStateManagerImpl into shared?]

2008-04-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Problem here again is the name of such a lib: myfaces-commons-base? myfaces-commons-core? myfaces-commons-super? myfaces-commons-commons? ;-) I'd opt for myfaces-base, but to say the truth, I do not care about the name, whatever name it has will be good for me as long as

Re: shared discuss again [was Re: JspStateManagerImpl into shared?]

2008-04-02 Thread Volker Weber
Hi, 2008/4/2, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Problem here again is the name of such a lib: myfaces-commons-base? myfaces-commons-core? myfaces-commons-super? myfaces-commons-commons? ;-) I'd opt for myfaces-base, but to say the truth, I do not care about

Re: shared discuss again [was Re: JspStateManagerImpl into shared?]

2008-04-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
we already have a very raw starting point in the current commons, not yet finished, but it's there ;-) The started commons-(converters|validators) are IMHO a other type of commons, not for use in jsf-impl classes but for application developper. This is for nice and convenient utils