+1 binding
On 2 Apr 2020, at 10:24, Miguel Azevedo wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, 11:53 Łukasz Rymanowski,
wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 12:52, Andrzej Kaczmarek
wrote:
+1 (binding)
/a.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:27 PM Szymon Janc wrote:
Hello all,
I am
Thanks Alvaro, this is great.
On 5 Jul 2019, at 6:32, Alvaro wrote:
I was able to figure out the issue that caused mcuboot to wipe the
image
every time.
The newt app was using the wrong flag value so the app image showed up
as
bootable: https://github.com/apache/mynewt-newt/pull/306
I also
Hi Justin,
I think conversations happen in 2 places:
- Slack
- Pull requests
Most of the technical conversations happen on the pull requests
themselves, I think this is fine. It’s archived, and people have an
opportunity to review & comment.
Slack is largely for support, with the
Hi Szymon,
Great, while you are looking at this, it would be excellent if you could
also do:
https://github.com/apache/mynewt-core/issues/1695
It would be good to get time on these changes to stabilize prior to next
release.
Sterling
On 10 Apr 2019, at 6:17, Szymon Janc wrote:
Hi,
+1
On 29 Mar 2019, at 13:22, Szymon Janc wrote:
Hello all,
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Mynewt 1.6.0 and Apache NimBLE 1.1.0.
Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source
initiative for constrained, embedded applications.
Hi,
I think where breaking out things has made sense has been when we can
get other people involved and grow the community of users of Mynewt
firmware. I’ll give a few examples:
- mcuboot: By breaking out the Mynewt boot loader, we’ve been able to
get Zephyr and RIOT to adopt it, leading
+1 binding
On 26 Jun 2018, at 10:45, Fabio Utzig wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Szymon Janc wrote:
Hello all,
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Mynewt 1.4.1.
Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open
source
Hi Suchitra,
Welcome! That’s awesome.
Regarding LWIP+6lowpan, I suggest you collaborate with Chris Collins,
who is doing some improvements to the IP support now. It would be great
to get that on top of a UWB transport.
Regarding supporting the decawave radio, could you write a proposal
+1 - this is great, thanks Lukasz!
On 19 Mar 2018, at 6:36, Łukasz Rymanowski wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I saw people asking around about possibility to advertise with non-mesh
> data while mesh is running on Mynewt. Well this is possible to do but of
> course it brings a lot of risk for mesh
Do folks think having a pin_t type makes sense where the function of the
pin can be stored in a standard way? I could see an argument for this
— obviously we couldn’t change all the code at once, but we could
start by adding that, and then slowly migrate to it.
On 8 Mar 2018, at 23:04,
Awesome, thanks @mlaz.
On 8 Mar 2018, at 21:00, Miguel Azevedo wrote:
Hi Markus, and everyone else,
My proposal for changes on our PWM API is on this PR (most recent
commit):
https://github.com/apache/mynewt-core/pull/836
I think it takes care of the oversized unorganized datastructure
I think we’ve left enough time, and everybody has agreed. Let’s get
on GitHub issues ASAP!
On 23 Feb 2018, at 5:31, Fabio Utzig wrote:
So, when is a decision going to be made?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018, at 11:15 AM, Miguel Azevedo wrote:
+1
I strongly agree to track issues on github, the
Hi,
I also think it would be useful to have some sort of concept of
“access” to the I2C bus, that is if a I2C transaction is in
progress, you can ask for the bus, and wait for the lock on a queue, and
then get posted an event when the lock has been acquired so that you can
use the bus. This
Hi Jacob, Lukasz,
Sorry for the late reply on this thread, just wanted to add on a few
thoughts. I definitely am open to improvements to OS device, it was
put in as the minimal framework for registering drivers in the system,
but it was by no-means complete when added.
- What I think OS
Is it the 128K or 256K version on these. If 128K, I’m pretty sure not
— but my guess is 256K could work with split images?
Sterling
On 18 Dec 2017, at 13:30, Alfred Schilken wrote:
Hello all,
I didn’t have the time yet for updating to version 1.3.
Most interesting for me would be the
Welcome!
On 24 Oct 2017, at 11:55, Josh Grob wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am reading the instructions for contributing, and the first
suggestion is to email the community. This will be my first
substantive contribution to an open source project, and what everyone
has done plus the mynewt vision
+1 - binding
On 8 Sep 2017, at 11:54, Szymon Janc wrote:
Hello all,
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Mynewt 1.2.0.
Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source
initiative for constrained, embedded applications. Mynewt provides a
Hi,
On 31 Aug 2017, at 8:35, David Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:29:34AM -0700, Sterling Hughes wrote:
In my opinion this should be a sub-project of Apache Mynewt:
apache-mynewt-nffs. The filesystem is a part of our operating
system, unlike a boot loader which is more naturally
Hi,
On 31 Aug 2017, at 8:19, aditi hilbert wrote:
On Aug 31, 2017, at 8:15 AM, David Brown
wrote:
BTW, can someone please remove the !@#$ Reply-to header in the apache
mailing lists? It completely breaks messages that are cross posted,
effectively stealing all
+1 binding
On 26 Jul 2017, at 8:05, Christopher Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:03:43AM +0200, Szymon Janc wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>> Apache Mynewt 1.1.0.
>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
mlaz,
I agree with you. If it’s possible, it would be great to see how
somebody could implement pwm_play() on top of the pwm driver, perhaps as
a package. But I think a better route is to find the most portable ppm
options, and get those going first.
Sterling
On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:54,
Hi Miguel,
I looked over the API, it looks good to me.
In the pwm_enable_duty_cycle() function, I assume the uint8_t is for the
channel. Are there PWMs where the duty cycle is per-channel, I would
think generally the duty cycle would be across all channels?
Sterling
On 10 Jul 2017, at
22 matches
Mail list logo