Re: our HAL and the new mbed-hal

2016-02-29 Thread will sanfilippo
Sterling (and all): >> I think we will need to: mbed-hal is being developed only for ARM >> processors. If we want to use the HAL on other MCUs (MIPS, 8051, Intel, >> etc.) -- it would be good to have this mapped. I am probably getting confused by how you worded that statement but the hal

Re: our HAL and the new mbed-hal

2016-02-28 Thread Sterling Hughes
On 2/28/16 10:02 PM, will sanfilippo wrote: Given the current state of the Mynewt hal, I think the question we need to answer is whether or not the mbed hal provides the functionality we think developers will need. Looks like what mbed is doing and mynewt is doing are very similar. Why not

Re: our HAL and the new mbed-hal

2016-02-28 Thread will sanfilippo
Given the current state of the Mynewt hal, I think the question we need to answer is whether or not the mbed hal provides the functionality we think developers will need. Looks like what mbed is doing and mynewt is doing are very similar. Why not just co-opt the mbed HAL entirely? I cant think

our HAL and the new mbed-hal

2016-02-27 Thread Sterling Hughes
Hi, I posted: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYNEWT-174 If folks have a little spare time to look at this over the weekend, I'd be super appreciative for any thoughts people have. I've spelled out what I'm thinking in the comments section. But the summary here is: it would be good