Re: Android app to interact with devices powered by Mynewt OS and BLE stack

Hi Samurdhi, Thanks for joining the @dev list! It’s great to hear you are interested in the work we are doing. The specific project you have inquired about is one we would love to offer for GSoC; however, the official start is a few months away and we are currently still working on the core

Re: Wiki / Confluence

resolved. I can add users. thanks aditi > On Feb 16, 2016, at 5:26 PM, aditi hilbert wrote: > > Or so I thought. I have asked Infrastructure why I don’t see that tab. > > thanks, > aditi > >> On Feb 16, 2016, at 5:16 PM, aditi hilbert >

Re: Wiki / Confluence

We already have a confluence space: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MYNEWT/Apache+Mynewt+Home I can add users. thanks, aditi > On Feb 16, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: Wiki / Confluence

Hi, > Is there ASF infrastructure to support a Wiki? Would someone mind putting > together a ticket for infrastructure, so we can start capturing this stuff > there? You can ask for it here [1] under 3 wiki request. You need to know the admin and initial contributors and a few other things.

Re: Kicking off a release

Hi, Who is going to act as release manager? > The latter, I think, has been successfully resolved on dev@mynewt and > general@incubator Yep agreed. > - Add release notes to the mynewt distribution > - Tag the tree with a B1 release tag (mynewt_0_8_0_b1_tag) > - Start a [VOTE] thread to [VOTE]

Wiki / Confluence

Hey, I'm starting to take a first stab at things like: - Release process - Roadmap Etc. It would be useful to have a WIKI to document these (we may end up summarizing them on the site, but I think this should live in a Wiki.) Is there ASF infrastructure to support a Wiki? Would someone

Kicking off a release

Mynewtites, It looks like master has stabilized, and we're pretty much done with B1 bugs: The remaining issues are here:

Re: Proposed changes to sys/stats

Thanks for the feedback, all. I will commit the first three changes to the develop branch, but leave proposal 4 unimplemented. Chris On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:35:16PM -0800, will sanfilippo wrote: > +1 for 1, 2 and 3. > > Not sure about 4. I am fine with using the macros and prefacing the

Re: Proposed changes to sys/stats

1. The STATS_SECT_START and STATS_SECT_END macros just define a struct; they don't create an instance. Generally, these macros would be used in a header file so that source files can have access to the struct definition. 2. The addition of a STATS_SECT_DECL macro. This macro would be used in