Hi, Will,
Thanks for your help,
The reason of nRF require high priority interrupts is that, from the point of
view of phone side, the nRF is a proxy of SIM card, it should be always ready
to receive phone command (UICC-terminal interface command). The arriving time
of this phone command can
Hello:
Yes, you can adjust interrupt priorities. With the develop branch of mynewt you
can adjust the priority for any interrupt.
By default, the radio uses the highest priority interrupt (0) for both the
nrf51 and nrf52. If you need the two highest priority interrupts you can do
that; you
Hi,
I’m working on a personal project and need some help from the community, since
I just start to know Mynewt recently and not familiar with it.
The project is about wireless SIM interface, this is a quite new concept, let’s
give more words here. Each mobile phone has an IC card called SIM
I have to add this line to my pkg.xml:
pkg.lflags: /workspace/hw/mcu/synochip/as568/src/as568_romfunc.a
/workspace/hw/mcu/synochip/as568/src/as568_crypto.a
Seems that works for me, but i'm not sure is that really OK?
xiangstu...@qq.com
+1
> I'm now not suggesting change what's in the core, instead, perhaps make
> available a simple struct wrapper and support functions/macros as
> 'codified' best practice of this pattern.
> I can take a look at creating a PR once I've seen the latest Event API and
> am closer to the v1.0
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Kevin Townsend wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don’t think that is possible at the moment. That needs to be added,
>> as the unfortunate reality is that too often we end up getting binary
>> drops of libraries :(
> A big +1 for this ... sadly, most
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:45:48AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Collins wrote:
> > Is there a particular reason that you would prefer this? By my reading
> > of the standard, using angled-brackets for this purpose contradicts
> >
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Collins wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:08:14AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote:
>> Good idea to write this down.
>>
>> I’d also like to include header files from other packages to be in the
>> group included with angle brackets.
Yes Lukasz, I know it does not appear when you build only when you try to run
it.
We will merge the pull request and all should be good.
Will
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Łukasz Rymanowski
> wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
>
> The issue is not visible during build time
Hi,
I don’t think that is possible at the moment. That needs to be added,
as the unfortunate reality is that too often we end up getting binary
drops of libraries :(
A big +1 for this ... sadly, most graphics libraries, complex protocol
stacks and a lot of security code is delivered in binary
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:08:14AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote:
> Good idea to write this down.
>
> I’d also like to include header files from other packages to be in the
> group included with angle brackets.
> Then “header.h” means local and is for non-local.
Is there a particular reason that
Hi,
I don’t think that is possible at the moment. That needs to be added,
as the unfortunate reality is that too often we end up getting binary
drops of libraries :(
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 2:02 AM, xiangstu...@qq.com wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone, my question as the subject describe, can anyone help
Good idea to write this down.
I’d also like to include header files from other packages to be in the
group included with angle brackets.
Then “header.h” means local and is for non-local.
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 6:01 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4 Nov 2016, at
Hello all,
Will found a bug in the host, which is probably (hopefully!) the only
bug here. I plan on testing and committing a fix for this bug later
today. In the meantime, here is the bug:
/* (ble_hs_heartbeat_sched(), ble_hs.c) */
/* Reset heartbeat timer if it is not currently
Hi Will,
The issue is not visible during build time but on a platform startup.
I believe that Michal's patch solves this issue so let's apply this patch
using git am or accept pull request he has prepared.
Best regards,
Lukasz
On Nov 7, 2016 4:12 PM, "will sanfilippo" wrote:
Hi Sterling,
I'm just migrating over to develop for mynewt-core and the newt tools
repos, and noticed the following after updating the command line
tools from develop:
- 'newt version' -> returns 0.9.0 in develop, this should probably be
0.10.0 to verify that you are using something
Hey all:
Sorry about this. I think my build found the startup file somewhere but what is
in develop doesnt. We will address this today.
Thanks, and sorry.
Will
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Michał Narajowski
> wrote:
>
> Also sent a pull request.
>
>
Also sent a pull request.
2016-11-07 14:15 GMT+01:00 Michał Narajowski
:
> With this patch it is possible to start nrf52dk board.
> Regression observed after patch:
> 290c683 MYNEWT-475: BSP Cleanup
> ---
> .../src/arch/cortex_m4/gcc_startup_nrf52.s | 289
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 6:15 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 7 Nov 2016, at 9:02, Kevin Townsend wrote:
>
>> I'm just migrating over to develop for mynewt-core and the newt tools repos,
>> and noticed the following after updating the command line tools from
With this patch it is possible to start nrf52dk board.
Regression observed after patch:
290c683 MYNEWT-475: BSP Cleanup
---
.../src/arch/cortex_m4/gcc_startup_nrf52.s | 289 +
.../src/arch/cortex_m4/gcc_startup_nrf52_split.s | 150 +++
Hi Kevin,
On 7 Nov 2016, at 9:02, Kevin Townsend wrote:
I'm just migrating over to develop for mynewt-core and the newt tools
repos, and noticed the following after updating the command line tools
from develop:
- 'newt version' -> returns 0.9.0 in develop, this should probably be
0.10.0 to
Thanks Chris,
On 4 November 2016 at 18:11, Christopher Collins
wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
>
> Good question. I'll address the specifics below, but I should mention
> that OS event handling has undergone some fairly major changes in recent
> days. Later today, I will send a follow
Hello, everyone, my question as the subject describe, can anyone help me,
thanks!
xiangstu...@qq.com
23 matches
Mail list logo