On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Christopher Collins
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Voting for Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b1-incubating-rc2 is now closed.
Hi all,
I was looking at prior releases, and noticed that the final step to publish
the release appears to have been done wrong. No
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:13:47AM -0800, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a part of developing the sensor interface, I want to register a
> “listener” on the event queue:
>
> listener.sl_sensor_type = type;
> listener.sl_func = sensor_shell_read_listener;
> listener.sl_arg =
Hi,
On Dec 11, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Christopher Collins
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:11:44AM -0800, will sanfilippo wrote:
Personally, I keep wanting to try and have the OS start up right
away.
I wonder if this could solve the problem that Sterling raised (no
I guess, for no really great reason, I thought it would be weird to malloc,
say, 1024 bytes, then free, say, 960 bytes. No weirder than what I was
suggesting. :-) I guess there a number of things we could do here: malloc a
temporary stack and free that whole thing and either do another malloc
Hi,
As a part of developing the sensor interface, I want to register a
“listener” on the event queue:
listener.sl_sensor_type = type;
listener.sl_func = sensor_shell_read_listener;
listener.sl_arg =
rc = sensor_register_listener(sensor, );
if (rc != 0) {
goto
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:11:44AM -0800, will sanfilippo wrote:
> Personally, I keep wanting to try and have the OS start up right away.
I wonder if this could solve the problem that Sterling raised (no
default event queue during sysinit). The control flow in main() might
look like this:
1.
Personally, I keep wanting to try and have the OS start up right away. There
are definitely “issues” with this:
a) We do not want to waste idle task stack.
b) When tasks are started they would start running right away. This might cause
issues where a task does something to a piece of memory that