Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-08 Thread Sterling Hughes
Hi, On 7 Nov 2016, at 19:04, Christopher Collins wrote: On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:45:48AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote: On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Collins wrote: Is there a particular reason that you would prefer this? By my reading of the standard, using

Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-07 Thread Christopher Collins
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:45:48AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Collins wrote: > > Is there a particular reason that you would prefer this? By my reading > > of the standard, using angled-brackets for this purpose contradicts > >

Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-07 Thread marko kiiskila
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Collins wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:08:14AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote: >> Good idea to write this down. >> >> I’d also like to include header files from other packages to be in the >> group included with angle brackets.

Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-07 Thread Christopher Collins
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:08:14AM -0800, marko kiiskila wrote: > Good idea to write this down. > > I’d also like to include header files from other packages to be in the > group included with angle brackets. > Then “header.h” means local and is for non-local. Is there a particular reason that

Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-07 Thread marko kiiskila
On 4 Nov 2016, at 16:34, Christopher Collins wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> We've been a bit inconsistent with our use of angled-brackets vs. quotes >> in #include directives. There is a simple rule for this one: use >> quotes for user headers; angled-

Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-05 Thread Adam
ello all, > > > > We've been a bit inconsistent with our use of angled-brackets vs. quotes > > in #include directives. There is a simple rule for this one: use > > quotes for user headers; angled-brackets for headers supplied by the > > implementation. "Implementation&q

Re: Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-04 Thread Sterling Hughes
On 4 Nov 2016, at 16:34, Christopher Collins wrote: > Hello all, > > We've been a bit inconsistent with our use of angled-brackets vs. quotes > in #include directives. There is a simple rule for this one: use > quotes for user headers; angled-brackets for h

Angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives

2016-11-04 Thread Christopher Collins
Hello all, We've been a bit inconsistent with our use of angled-brackets vs. quotes in #include directives. There is a simple rule for this one: use quotes for user headers; angled-brackets for headers supplied by the implementation. "Implementation" is a technical term meaning the c