Thanks Andrzej. That makes sense.
Chris
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:57:48PM +0100, Andrzej Kaczmarek wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I created a pull request which also updates API to raw data for the
> opposite direction, i.e. from host to app. Application can still parse this
> to ble_hs_adv_fields
Hi Chris,
I created a pull request which also updates API to raw data for the
opposite direction, i.e. from host to app. Application can still parse this
to ble_hs_adv_fields since helper is now public, but has to do this
explicitly. The advantage is that if application prefers to work on raw
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:40:04PM -0800, will sanfilippo wrote:
> I am not sure I have any intelligent comments on this, but that has never
> stopped me from commenting in the past, so…
No worries. Thanks for the feedback!
>
> I think a byte buffer interface is fine as long as you have
+1 ... raw buffer plus helpers offers the best of both worlds imho.
Le mar. 24 janv. 2017 à 21:40, will sanfilippo a écrit :
> I am not sure I have any intelligent comments on this, but that has never
> stopped me from commenting in the past, so…
>
>
>
> I think a byte buffer
I am not sure I have any intelligent comments on this, but that has never
stopped me from commenting in the past, so…
I think a byte buffer interface is fine as long as you have helper functions to
create that buffer. Having folks have to figure out how to create an
advertisement without any