Re: Resolving GPLv2-CPE categorization as Category X (was: Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support)

2019-05-16 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 20:18, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > The points raised in the referenced issue target the CPE. And the CPE > is started with "Certain source files distributed by Oracle America > and/or its affiliates[...]". So yes, this is Oracle specific and Oracle > lawyers could give their o

Re: Resolving GPLv2-CPE categorization as Category X (was: Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support)

2019-05-16 Thread Victor Corral
thank you on that. Its not the money nor the Power im intreated in its the environment that matters most to me. That and you could say my lottery i guess. Let let me explain I started this way back in 2004 probably when I got a letter from Microsoft in Google saying I had won a lottery and Incorpor

Resolving GPLv2-CPE categorization as Category X (was: Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support)

2019-05-16 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2019, 18:54 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 17:53, Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > Even better, Oracle would be in the > > position to change the wording of the license if necessary and they > > are > > the only ones, that could do it. > > Actually, the

Re: Unix socket implementation

2019-05-16 Thread Laszlo Kishalmi
Set it to Next, right now. On 5/16/19 11:03 AM, Bartosz Tomasik wrote: W dniu 09.05.2019 o 22:34, Bartosz Tomasik pisze: W dniu 08.05.2019 o 06:15, Jaroslav Tulach pisze: Hello Bartosz, having a way to connect to docker via Unix sockets would be great. let's try than: https://github.com/apac

Re: When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Awesome! Pete, you’re an absolute validation of everything we’re doing here. Gj On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 19:42, Pete Whelpton wrote: > I'm not sure the handful of bug fixes I've submitted is significant - > especially compared to huge amount of work contributed by others over the > years ;) > > B

Re: Unix socket implementation

2019-05-16 Thread Bartosz Tomasik
W dniu 09.05.2019 o 22:34, Bartosz Tomasik pisze: > W dniu 08.05.2019 o 06:15, Jaroslav Tulach pisze: >> Hello Bartosz, >> having a way to connect to docker via Unix sockets would be great. >> > let's try than: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1242 > > -- ok now, what are the guidelines for

Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support

2019-05-16 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 17:53, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > Even better, Oracle would be in the > position to change the wording of the license if necessary and they are > the only ones, that could do it. Actually, they can't - and I'm going on the basis that they're not going to write a completely n

Re: When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Pete Whelpton
I'm not sure the handful of bug fixes I've submitted is significant - especially compared to huge amount of work contributed by others over the years ;) But I'm more than happy to sign an iCLA - I'll send one off to ASF tomorrow. All the best, Pete On Thu, 16 May 2019, 18:13 Geertjan Wielenga,

Re: When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
I think Mark Phipps and Pete Whelpton have committed quite some code and/or have PRs that are significant -- would be great if they're provide iCLAs, i.e., how do we want to approach this, just ask them, hope they see this, etc? Gj On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:08 PM Eric Barboni wrote: > Hi, > > W

Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support

2019-05-16 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2019, 17:42 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 17:10, Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > While the question whether GPLv2-CPE could be considered > > Category-B is still not resolved [1] between Oracle and the ASF, > > To be pedantic, I fail to see how Oracle

Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support

2019-05-16 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 17:10, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > While the question whether GPLv2-CPE could be considered > Category-B is still not resolved [1] between Oracle and the ASF, To be pedantic, I fail to see how Oracle is relevant to how ASF decides to resolve this issue, but it's one that's go

Re: JavaFX Netbeans 11

2019-05-16 Thread joe schmo
My projects are brand new and empty. I was just wondering why I had to modify the POM to get it to compile in Windows and not Ubuntu. Not a big deal I was just curious. BC From: Luff,Chris Sent: May 16, 2019 11:08 AM To: dev@netbeans.apache.org Subject: Re: Ja

Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support

2019-05-16 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi Emmanuell, Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2019, 14:29 +0200 schrieb ehsavoie: > The JavaEE 8 schemas are still under LGPL right ? How do you manage > that ? the JavaEE 8 schemas are no problem. Oracle provided these under GPLv2- CPE and CDDL. While the question whether GPLv2-CPE could be considered

RE: When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Eric Barboni
Hi, Would it be possible to at make sure when PR created by non commiter is created that this page has been read https://netbeans.apache.org/participate/submit-pr.html ? This may give idea to contributor that he may sign iCLA by themselves and start they journey in Apache. This because you may

Re: JavaFX Netbeans 11

2019-05-16 Thread Luff,Chris
It really depends on the complexity of your project - however openJFX[1] has some useful starting points up to and including a PR[3] to include a base starting point with new nbactions.xml for NetBeans. If you project is modular, you can follow a series I have been writing on DZone that also in

Re: When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:47 PM Christian Lenz wrote: > When I talk to colleagues about NetBeans contribution they say: „But I’m not > a Apache comitter.“ > And some of them don’t want to sign such a „contract“. And I say: „You don’t > need to be one, > just fork it, make a PR and that’s ge

AW: When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Christian Lenz
Hi, so for my understanding, a non Apache comitter that creates a PR to fix smth or whatever, does also need one, right? When I talk to colleagues about NetBeans contribution they say: „But I’m not a Apache comitter.“ And some of them don’t want to sign such a „contract“. And I say: „You don’t

Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support

2019-05-16 Thread ehsavoie
Josh, The JavaEE 8 schemas are still under LGPL right ? How do you manage that ? Cheers, Emmanuel -- Emmanuel Hugonnet http://www.ehsavoie.com http://twitter.com/ehsavoie On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:05 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Excellent progress, thanks! > > Gj > > On Thu, May 9, 201

Re: Release process - update center configuration problem?

2019-05-16 Thread Antonio
El 16/05/2019 a las 11:37, Neil C Smith escribió: On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 10:19, Antonio wrote: Thanks! That doesn't actually answer the question of where it is/was intended for update.xml.gz to be downloaded from though? It kind of suggests it was intended to be only for nbm files? It does

When is an iCLA needed?

2019-05-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, Someone asked about this - in brief, from the ASF's point of view an iCLA [1] is only required for committers, once they get elected. See also [2] and [3]. Apart from that I fully agree with this quote from Sam Ruby from [4]: > ...CLAs are encouraged for all significant contributions, where

Re: Release process - update center configuration problem?

2019-05-16 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 10:19, Antonio wrote: > You may want to read the documentation of the Apache NetBeans Update > Center in the "infra" section at [1]. Thanks! That doesn't actually answer the question of where it is/was intended for update.xml.gz to be downloaded from though? It kind of su

Re: JavaFX Netbeans 11

2019-05-16 Thread joe schmo
I can't find the link to it but Geertjan provided a youtube tutorial to show the changes needed, they were fairly minimal. I am using JDK 11 on Windows and Ubuntu. BC From: Luff,Chris Sent: May 16, 2019 4:44 AM To: dev@netbeans.apache.org Subject: Re: JavaFX Ne

Re: Release process - update center configuration problem?

2019-05-16 Thread Antonio
Hi, You may want to read the documentation of the Apache NetBeans Update Center in the "infra" section at [1]. AFAIK the "users being banned" is just for a single user (out of thousands) and seems related to the "closer.lua" script, not redirections. Cheers, Antonio [1] https://cwiki.apach

RE: apidoc production rewrite

2019-05-16 Thread Eric Barboni
Hi, We need something that can be fetch and parsed during site generation, by a Jenkins pipeline build (groovy), by the cron apidoc stuff. I would also request that we use named key instead instead of a simple array. I will put the onliner Jenkinsfile on the git in the nbbuild/jenkins folder f

Release process - update center configuration problem?

2019-05-16 Thread Neil C Smith
Hi, As part of preparing for the next release (or more accurately, preparing me for it!) I'm looking through https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+Release+README and will make some edits soon (eg. removing incubating where necessary) In #7 we have the following two

Re: JavaFX Netbeans 11

2019-05-16 Thread Luff,Chris
What modifications do you have to make? What JDK are you running the build and NetBean upon? > On 15 May 2019, at 11:15, joe schmo wrote: > > I have recently installed Netbeans 11.0 on Ubuntu 18.04 ,created a JavaFX > project and it works fine out of the box, which is odd. I have been using >