NetBeans 11.1 with Java 11 fails to read package annotations

Hi all, it seems that a NetBeans 11.1 platform app running on Java 11 (oracle jdk11.0.4) doesn't read annotations at package level properly. If I'm not mistaken for whatever reason this is a really nasty bug. Please have a look at this to reproduce: https://github.com/borisheithecker/packagelevel

Re: [news] Plugin Portal 3.0 on the horizon

That is cool! My only concern is about Google SSO, it is not convenient for the users in areas that google can not reach, China for example. So is it a MUST? or it's optional? On 2019/10/10 5:46, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > Hello NetBeans people, > >    if you have ever fine-tuned your NetBeans IDE wi

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

+1 Thilina01 On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 8:33 PM Eric Barboni wrote: > Dear members of Apache NetBeans community. > > it's been a long time since last vote call. ( :D ) > > I want to call a vote on releasing the following Apache NetBeans > Archetypes: > > 1) nbm-archetype-1.17 > 2) nbm-suite-root-1.1

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

+1 Cheers Kai On 10/10/2019 5:03 PM, Eric Barboni wrote: Dear members of Apache NetBeans community. it's been a long time since last vote call. ( :D ) I want to call a vote on releasing the following Apache NetBeans Archetypes: 1) nbm-archetype-1.17 2) nbm-suite-root-1.12 3) netbeans-platfo

Re: Possible NB 11.2 blocker?

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, 19:36 Neil C Smith, wrote: > It appears > we're getting a NPE in OptionsChooserPanel related to reading the > netbeans.buildnumber system property. But I think this is still being > set correctly? > Thanks Apache hive mind of Matthias and Christian! Debugging via GitHub UI

Possible NB 11.2 blocker?

Hi, Saw an issue report today which might be the sign of a blocking issue in NB 11.2. I won't be able to look further until Monday. It appears we're getting a NPE in OptionsChooserPanel related to reading the netbeans.buildnumber system property. But I think this is still being set correctly?

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

+1 El vie., 11 oct. 2019 a las 12:40, Patrick Musembi () escribió: > +1 > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 20:31 James Gosling wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additi

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

+1 On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 20:31 James Gosling wrote: > +1 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about th

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

+1 Gj On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 17:20, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > Let's keep it rolling! > > +1 (binding) > > On 10/10/19 8:03 AM, Eric Barboni wrote: > > Dear members of Apache NetBeans community. > > > > it's been a long time since last vote call. ( :D ) > > > > I want to call a vote on releasing

Re: [news] Plugin Portal 3.0 on the horizon

The thinking is that we can’t guarantee to users that any random repo is stable, while the Maven Central repo is that. Of course, we can discuss this and where possible modify and adapt as needed. But we need to start somewhere, otherwise we’ll be working on this forever. Source code, to be donat

Re: [VOTE] Maven Archetypes new release based on plugin 4.3

Let's keep it rolling! +1 (binding) On 10/10/19 8:03 AM, Eric Barboni wrote: Dear members of Apache NetBeans community. it's been a long time since last vote call. ( :D ) I want to call a vote on releasing the following Apache NetBeans Archetypes: 1) nbm-archetype-1.17 2) nbm-suite-root-1.12

Re: [news] Plugin Portal 3.0 on the horizon

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, 15:21 Sven Reimers, wrote: > I was not asking for a different repository type, but just an additional > maven repository provider > I'm still not sure why we're even requiring Maven, but I guess we can find out and argue about that when the source is released?! :-/ Out

Re: [news] Plugin Portal 3.0 on the horizon

Well, maven is an Apache thing, maven central is not... I was not asking for a different repository type, but just an additional maven repository provider Thanks for reconsidering -Sven Jiří Kovalský schrieb am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019, 15:12: > Hi Sven, > > I do not think this is a good id

Re: [news] Plugin Portal 3.0 on the horizon

Hi Sven, I do not think this is a good idea. We have decided to integrate with Apache owned solution for simplicity and competing reasons. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards, -Jirka Dne 10. 10. 19 v 19:26 Sven Reimers napsal(a): Hi, awesome. Just an idea: Could we add bintra

Re: maven-compiler-plugin problem

Configuration is incorrect for JDK ^9 org.apache.maven.plugins maven-compiler-plugin 9 Chris Luff | Associate Principal Engineer | UK Development - Care Insight and Delivery Dev | chris.l...@cerner.com | +44

Using JIRA Id of external issue tracker

Hi all, For Payara NetBeans module's bugs & features, Payara Jira tracker is used which helps us in monthly sprint planning. See the PR title for example ( https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1562) starts with NP-38. Is it mandatory to use NetBeans JIRA Id in Github PR title? Thanks and kind