Re: Maven Archetypes

2021-01-28 Thread Will Hartung
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:49 PM Josh Juneau wrote: > Sorry, but there must be something incorrect with the Java EE 8 project > archetype that you are using. When I use Apache NetBeans to create a Java > EE 8 project, I select the following: > > - New: "Java with Maven" -> "Web Application" > >

Re: Maven Archetypes

2021-01-28 Thread Josh Juneau
Hi Will, > The biggest issue with the archetype is that it's not designed for the NB > JEE wizard at all, which actually creates 4 related projects instead of > one. And there seems to be some regression that has crept in to the JEE 7 > project builder that's making it fail. So, the greenfield

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] revised release schedule for 2021

2021-01-28 Thread Josh Juneau
+1 Josh Juneau juneau...@gmail.com http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:55 AM Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > Based on the thread at > >

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] revised release schedule for 2021

2021-01-28 Thread Laszlo Kishalmi
+1 On 1/27/21 9:55 AM, Neil C Smith wrote: Hi All, Based on the thread at https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ea55f3d1e14186bd9f149c8771308cf0a5bf3c2ef784604e8e1c764%40%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E , as well as the fact I've started referring to 12.4 in various places already, and there are

Netbeans Git Performance

2021-01-28 Thread Eric Bresie
I may have asked before but...Why is running git from the command line so much faster compared to doing so within Netbeans itself? I believe at the time the answer was "the git support using egit uses an very old version" and I believe there may have been a PR to update this, but as of 12.2 when

Re: macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread Christian Oyarzun
> So, was there any specific tech reason to not use the bin/netbeans script? > or did you just happen to find yourself at nbexec when you were done? I looked at the Windows native launcher code and what the netbeans script did and decided to implement similar logic in the Swift code. > Do you

Disabled mirroring of hg.netbeans.org -> netbeans.osuosl.org (was: Re: Missing platform-launchers-12.2.zip?)

2021-01-28 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2021, 17:25 +0100 schrieb Svata Dedic: > in fact all the binaries are present at > https://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/netbeans/binaries/ but are not linked from > the web (see note at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115507251). > > If

Re: macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread Will Hartung
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:50 AM Neil C Smith wrote: > It's not invoking Java directly though, just the next script in the > chain at > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/blob/master/platform/o.n.bootstrap/launcher/unix/nbexec > So, was there any specific tech reason to not use the bin/netbeans

Re: macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 15:51, Will Hartung wrote: > On that note, though, if this wrapper works, and works now, and we're that > close to 12.3, I would think it's worth having this capability in 12.3 now, > and fix it for bin/netbeans after the release, rather than removing the > capability from

Re: macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread Neil C Smith
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 14:56, John Mc wrote: > I can take the betas this week(maybe at the weekend) and do it again, and > upload it to SVN for others to test it? That sounds like a good approach if you're happy to do that. Thanks, Neil

Re: macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread Will Hartung
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:57 AM Neil C Smith wrote: > While I understand we likely need a native executable to fix this > issue, I remain of the view that it probably should be a stub calling > bin/netbeans, not duplicating its function and directly calling > platform/lib/nbexec I have deep

Re: macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread John Mc
Hi Neil, So when I was testing the PR, I built the installer in the same way I normally for each release, do. I can take the betas this week(maybe at the weekend) and do it again, and upload it to SVN for others to test it? Regards John On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 13:56, Neil C Smith wrote: > Hi

macOS launcher changes, NETBEANS-5004, comments, testing, etc.

2021-01-28 Thread Neil C Smith
Hi All, So, just before release freeze we had https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2563 merged as a fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS/issues/NETBEANS-5004 I assume this means we'll try and have a native executable as the launcher in the macOS installer option for 12.3?

Sorry, wrong list (was: Re: Netbeans 12.2 Java EE code completion (e.g. omnifaces) not always working as expected)

2021-01-28 Thread Jens Zurawski
Oops, I'm afraid, this was the wrong mailing list Pardon me, I'll repost it in users-help - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org

Re: Re: Missing platform-launchers-12.2.zip?

2021-01-28 Thread Neil C Smith
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 19:42, Eric Bresie wrote: > Will any similar updates be needed for 12.3 coming soon? Unless they're really critical fixes, I hope not! ;-) Neil - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Netbeans 12.2 Java EE code completion (e.g. omnifaces) not always working as expected

2021-01-28 Thread Jens Zurawski
Hi all, I'm currently developing a new Java EE Web application (targeting a TomEE 8.x webprofile), and because it's a new development I already want to start it in Java EE 8/JSF 2.3 (but the code completion problems also shows in a Java EE 7/JSF 2.2 setup). I have to admit that I'm fairly new

AW: Collaborative Editing with Netbeans

2021-01-28 Thread Christian Lenz
Hey, my 2 cents here, what I see from VS Code and IntelliJ there collaborative Features. They hosted smth on the web. VS Code uses GitHub I think for contributing and IntelliJ also has a host for this. So I think this. It is not About chatting it is About pair programming: