Probably stating the obvious but..
Would the net...@netbeans.apache.org mailing list be of use here?
Eric Bresie
ebre...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:11 AM Kenneth Fogel
wrote:
> Yes, NetCAT is the best tool for determining functionality under a JDK.
> Who should I communicate with con
Well, I'd like to see some insights from the RMs how they felt this
release. I myself followed the things from more distance than I usually do.
I'd mention that Svatopluk Dedic started to contribute a lot to the
Gradle support, which I cannot be thankful enough, so it is not a one
man band thi
On 6/11/21 8:41 AM, Kenneth Fogel wrote:
Did you say we are all Spartacus? Or was that NetCAT? ;~}
Are we not cats? We are NetCAT!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3bF0N081TE
--
Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682)
"After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
---
I’m not aware of any specific plans.
Sounds like a few on the thread may have sone interest and some solutions
but beyond that I’m not sure anyone has actively been working them beyond
what’s been expressed here.
I think at the time I was trying to bring in an old plug-in that made use
of it but
Did you say we are all Spartacus? Or was that NetCAT? ;~}
From: Geertjan Wielenga
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 9:13:42 AM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenJDK Quality Outreach
All of us, everyone. We are all NetCAT.
Gj
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 15:11,
All of us, everyone. We are all NetCAT.
Gj
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 15:11, Kenneth Fogel
wrote:
> Yes, NetCAT is the best tool for determining functionality under a JDK.
> Who should I communicate with concerning NetCAT?
>
> Ken
>
>
> From: Geertjan Wielenga
> Se
Yes, NetCAT is the best tool for determining functionality under a JDK. Who
should I communicate with concerning NetCAT?
Ken
From: Geertjan Wielenga
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2021 8:36:21 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: OpenJDK Quality Outreach
Great progress, thank you,
Great progress, thank you, Ken.
Maybe this is where NetCAT can come into the picture.
Gj
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:34 PM Kenneth Fogel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have learned that while we were listed on the OpenJDK Quality Outreach
> wiki page, we never received any correspondence because thee was
>
Hi,
I have learned that while we were listed on the OpenJDK Quality Outreach wiki
page, we never received any correspondence because thee was uncertainty over
who was the point of contact. This despite the fact that Geertjan appears as
the point of contact in the wiki.
I have asked Rory to rep
