On 2023-11-23 21:43, Alex Orlov wrote:
Hi all!
As I understand nobody reads NB github discussions so I will ask here.
Could anyone say — why NB doesn’t support /src/it/java
and /src/it/resources folders for integration tests and their
resources? There is such issue
https://issues.apache.or
Hello,
I recognized that the slack invite link on the NetBeans website is
expired. I opened a issue [1] about that. Neil closed it mentioning to
discuss the topic on the mailing list - here we are ;)
Greetings
Benjamin
[1] https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/6313
-
ion it contains
netbeans-jakartaee-war-archetype contributed by Benjamin Asbach
Header are removed from file in
netbeans-jakartaee-war-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources
in
order to prevent Apache License to be set on the created project.
The voted artefacts sources are locat
+1 (non binding)
On 2023-07-05 22:18, Eric Barboni wrote:
Dear members of Apache NetBeans community.
I want to call a vote on releasing Apache NetBeans parent pom 4. This
is a
technical artefact.
This is a maven pom containing basic information needed like mailing
list,license for our others
+1 (non binding)
On 2023-07-04 21:09, Eric Barboni wrote:
Hi,
I've not tested the archetype but to me no problem to call a vote and
release a version on central.
Build is ok.
Best Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Benjamin Asbach
Envoyé : lundi 3 juillet 2023 10:
ontag, dem 03.07.2023 um 20:01 +0800 schrieb Benjamin Asbach:
During the work on the support I wanted to extend this part to support
jakarta namespaces:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/blob/2edeaf99fc099b754b234600dbc491f0449659b0/enterprise/web.jsf.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/jsf/e
Hello,
Context: I currently try to bring support for jakarta namespaces to jsf
support.
During the work on the support I wanted to extend this part to support
jakarta namespaces:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/blob/2edeaf99fc099b754b234600dbc491f0449659b0/enterprise/web.jsf.editor/src/o
As still issues are popping up regarding the creation of Java/Jakarta EE
projects I just wondering how we want to proceed with this:
Should the archetypes be deployed to maven central or should them be
packaged with NetBeans somehow?
What needs to be done for each solution?
Greetings
Benjami
: Eric Barboni
Objet : Re: Maven Project Archetypes used by NetBeans
+1 for centralizing the archetypes. Thanks for updating the Jakarta EE
archetype…looking forward to trying it out!
Josh Juneau
On May 16, 2023, at 6:16 PM, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
Thanks for your response.
I created
st Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Josh Juneau Envoyé : mercredi 17 mai 2023
02:01
À :dev@netbeans.apache.org
Cc : Eric Barboni
Objet : Re: Maven Project Archetypes used by NetBeans
+1 for centralizing the archetypes. Thanks for updating the Jakarta
EE archetype…looki
ng forward to trying it out!
Josh Juneau
On May 16, 2023, at 6:16 PM, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
Thanks for your response.
I created a archetype for JakartaEE war projects from scratch. In
contrast to the current used archetype it:
* does not configure endorsed dir compiler stuff (actually I n
r updating the Jakarta EE
archetype…looking forward to trying it out!
Josh Juneau
On May 16, 2023, at 6:16 PM, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
Thanks for your response.
I created a archetype for JakartaEE war projects from scratch. In
contrast to the current used archetype it:
* does not configure en
jamin
On 2023-05-15 18:22, Eric Barboni wrote:
Hi,
This can be done. We already have the one for netbeans platform.
We must have a complete list + having the ok to go from author to give
the
source to us. (IP-clearance).
Best Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Benjamin Asba
Hej,
I recently had a look into
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/4552
I just wonder if NetBeans project want to rely on third party archetypes
which cannot be adjusted easily.
Would it a good idea to maintain and distribute NetBeans within the
NetBeans git repository so that the N
I'm a little bit curious how this "latest Release" field is supposed to
work? Is this moved automatically when a new release was pumped out?
On 2022-01-12 13:04, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 14:28, Neil C Smith
wrote:
Just a note that, if you haven't noticed already, GitHub Disc
NetBeans it's still the text I copied inside
NetBeans.
It seems that the connection between Java and Windows Clipboard
disappeared completely.
On 2022-01-05 00:37, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if I'm the only one encountering problems with Copy & Paste
not working after som
Hi,
I wonder if I'm the only one encountering problems with Copy & Paste not
working after some IDE usage. After I restart NetBeans it's working
again.
As far as I can remember some time ago there was a jdk bug regarding
copy & paste.
As I'm using a quite exotic dev environment Linux (NixO
Hello,
this might somehow be connected to the discussion about switching to
GitHub issues and release managers for 12.6.
I recognized that released versions have still open bugs in Jira [1].
I wonder what this should mean? The issue is in wrong state aka the task
were done, but is not in the
Hi Scott,
do you see this behavior in NetBeans 12.4 as well? Are you in a
cooperate environment? Sometimes there are problems with Antivirus
solutions or Network Drives.
Is a slow report generated?
Cheers
Benjamin
On 2021-09-28 11:42, Scott Palmer wrote:
NB 12.5 Running on JDK 16 Windows
Hi,
NetBeans 12.5 is still marked as unreleased in Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin%3Arelease-page&status=unreleased
Cheers
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi,
I mentioned that 12.4 is still marked as unreleased [1]
Thanks
Benjamin
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:release-page
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
.2021 13:34, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Is this something we can do as Apache NetBeans or something that should
be
done on the level of the Apache Software Foundation?
Gj
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 21:32, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
Actually I'd just allow bots to index the issues. Tbh I cannot
- at lease
the NetBeans issues - to a place where indexer bots are allowed to index
it.
Thanks
Benjamin
On 21.07.2021 13:25, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
What is the solution you’re proposing?
Gj
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 20:58, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
I wonder what your thoughts are on that topic: C
I wonder what your thoughts are on that topic: Currently Apache Jira is
configured so that search engines are discouraged to index Jira issues.
From my point of view this leads to a scenario where users/developers
don't find the right bugs, cannot contribute valuable information, are
encouraged
Hi,
I'm looking for someone having a review/sponsor my PR [1].
I'm lacking this feature quite a lot since the plugin I normally used is
not compatible with recent NetBeans version. So I decided to reimplement
that feature directly in NetBeans.
Since it was quite hard to find the right module
Hi,
I saw that Code Conventions are linked to [1] on wiki page [2].
Maybe someone with edit right might fix that.
Cheers
Benjamin
[1] https://netbeans.org/community/guidelines/code-conventions.html
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74681408
---
On 01.07.2021 22:36, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Dne čtvrtek 1. července 2021 20:35:27 CEST, Benjamin Asbach napsal(a):
[nb-javac]
/home/asbachb/dev/extsrc/netbeans/platform/api.annotations.common/src/org/ne
tbeans/api/annotations/common/proc/StaticResourceProcessor.java
[repeat]
error: Bad
Hello,
I try to compile branch "release124" on NixOS which fails.
```
[nix-shell:~/dev/extsrc/netbeans]$ java -version
openjdk version "11.0.10" 2021-01-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.10+0-adhoc..source)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.10+0-adhoc..source, mixed mode)
```
```
[n
Maybe there could be a GraalVM compiled sdk loader before the
application starts. So you're able to choose an sdk with proper license.
Something similar is available in IDEA.
Greetings
Benjamin
On 02.01.2021 17:44, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
On 1/2/21 7:37 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 20
Hi Chris,
I guess you were might running into that issue[1]. The version you
mentioned should not work with 12.1 either.
Maybe you could retry with lombok edge or downgrade.
[1] https://github.com/rzwitserloot/lombok/issues/2612
Greetings
Benjamin
On 01.12.2020 18:03, Luff,Chris wrote:
Wor
Your solution sounds a litte bit weired.
NetBeans is coming with a bundled maven version which you can change in
NetBeans settings (Tools / Options / Java / Maven).
Greetings
Benjamin
On 29 October 2020 15:41:57 CET, Eduard Karel de Jong
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to build an open source pr
Hi Patrick,
Disclaimer: Not a snap pro.
from my understanding that's the point behind a snap is to bundle all
it's dependencies and separate it from the rest of the system. So
combining sdkman and NetBeans snap doesn't seem the right way for me.
When it works from command line vs via Desktop
Maybe before adding HSTS Headers it would make sense to do a
redirect/rewrite to see if some other issues pop up with forced ssl.
---
Thanks
Benjamin
On 2020-03-04 13:14, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 12:06, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
netbeans.apache.org
Does have the noted prob
Hi,
I wonder if it's supposed that http://apache.netbeans.org does not
redirect to https://apache.netbeans.org?
Maybe enable HSTS would be another option too.
--
Thanks
Benjamin
0xDBDA3F83.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ribing the problem
within the commit.
--
Thanks
Benjamin
On 2019-11-20 21:38, Matthias Bläsing wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.11.2019, 15:31 -0500 schrieb Tim Boudreau:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:36 PM Benjamin Asbach
wrote:
> So why
> having these information in project history
I don't want to argue for squashed commits but for changing the commit
history of pull request branches.
From my point of view a commit should provide additional information
about what changed. Having commits based on a code review like "fixed
typo", "added review comment" there's no additional
36 matches
Mail list logo