Re: [DISCUSS] Status of tomlj

2023-09-25 Thread Pyro MX
Could Jackson be an option? I don't know how complete its TOML support is, but it could be worth a shot: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-text/tree/master/toml Le 2023-09-25 à 15 h 23, Michael Bien a écrit : Hi Antonio, On 21.09.23 19:22, Antonio wrote: Hi all, I've just fou

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of tomlj

2023-09-25 Thread Antonio
Hi, Well, the antlr4 grammar needed some hammer blows :-), but looks like we'll be able to parse that rust file after all... [1]. I tried to do a PR against tomlj, but it's too complicated for me to modify within my available time slots (I think it'll require changing the grammar, seems to b

Re: [DISCUSS] Status of tomlj

2023-09-25 Thread Michael Bien
Hi Antonio, On 21.09.23 19:22, Antonio wrote: Hi all, I've just found a bug in the tomlj library [1], which prevents the rust cluster to properly parse a well formed Cargo.toml document. So we need an alternate TOML parser for Rust. I've seen that the author of tomlj is requesting maintaine

[DISCUSS] Status of tomlj

2023-09-21 Thread Antonio
Hi all, I've just found a bug in the tomlj library [1], which prevents the rust cluster to properly parse a well formed Cargo.toml document. So we need an alternate TOML parser for Rust. I've seen that the author of tomlj is requesting maintainers since 2022, with little success (I've also s