Dne čtvrtek 17. února 2022 1:45:20 CET, Vladimir Machat napsal(a):
> Thanks, I know how to do it, I was just wondering why it's not done by
> Netbeans the same it is done for Ant project...
Improvements and contributions to
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/3262
welcomed!
-jt
>
> On
To a new user, it is unexpected and the disconnect between some of the
project properties and Maven is a surprise. I think the some users expect
more from the IDE.
I can understand the challenges of doing this in that it is like adding
another programming language where some of the syntax is in
Thanks, I know how to do it, I was just wondering why it's not done by
Netbeans the same it is done for Ant project...
On 16/02/2022 21:31, Tim de Vries wrote:
I have a tool which packages to executable jar with optional manifest
attributes. I was hoping to charge $1/user/month. I don’t know
I should have maybe also said, it has options for source, binaries and jars,
code signing and remote deployment via pki all in code, all in java, has a
multi class launcher and various other utilities to facilitate development and
all source code is included. And I could probably set up a
I have a tool which packages to executable jar with optional manifest
attributes. I was hoping to charge $1/user/month. I don’t know if that’s
allowed here.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 11:55 AM, antonio wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Adding the main class in MANIFEST.MF is not good enough
Hi,
Adding the main class in MANIFEST.MF is not good enough to run a Maven
project with "java -jar". You also want to create a "fat jar" with all
the dependencies in it. See [1] for guidance.
> Is there a reason why Netbeans doesn't do it?
Here're some possible answers (of my own, doesn't
Hi all,
I was just wondering, is Netbeans supposed to fill out the main
attribute in MANIFEST.MF that goes to the jar file, when building Maven
project?
At the moment it doesn't do it, which means that the resulting jar can't
be executed just by
$ java -jar App.jar
I would expect
