WIP but I'm done for today.
If anyone want to make it a step further they are welcome..
Cya
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Barboni <>
Envoyé : lundi 13 juin 2022 15:58
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : RE: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Reorganize maven-utilities repository into o
n 2022 15:16
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Reorganize maven-utilities repository into one
Hi Eric,
Am Sonntag, dem 12.06.2022 um 08:06 -0500 schrieb Eric Bresie:
> I know this is something like this has been asked before but...would
> that mean converting o
Hi Eric,
Am Sonntag, dem 12.06.2022 um 08:06 -0500 schrieb Eric Bresie:
> I know this is something like this has been asked before but...would that
> mean converting over Netbeans to build via Maven or just the individual
> clusters? Is that something to consider?
Nothing of this. This is about
I know this is something like this has been asked before but...would that
mean converting over Netbeans to build via Maven or just the individual
clusters? Is that something to consider? I know attempts have been made
in the past but not full on buy in yet. I'm assuming it's "if it's not
broke
Concerning the BOM, I am intensively using this concept to compose our own
applications clusters (by the way I gained some experience there and did
some interesting discoveries like the possibility to use branding BOMs).
There is already the "platform" BOM why not extend the concept starting
with
Oh yes that would be great +100 for me ;-)
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:18 PM Eric Barboni wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Me again sorry .
>
> I would like to regroup the maven-utilities repository back into one. I
> like very much writing voting mail that are longer than the code changes
> but I would
Dne pátek 3. června 2022 16:19:37 CEST, Neil C Smith napsal(a):
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2022, 13:59 antonio, wrote:
> > The "BOM" (Bill of Materials) is a packaging that "defines the
> > versions of all the artifacts that will be created in the library. ...
> >
> > So basically this will be a pom.xml
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022, 13:59 antonio, wrote:
> The "BOM" (Bill of Materials) is a packaging that "defines the
> versions of all the artifacts that will be created in the library. ...
>
> So basically this will be a pom.xml with pom that
> list all other module dependencies.
>
> I don't think it's
Could be great for both the mavenutilies and the resulting platform artefacts.
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : antonio <>
Envoyé : vendredi 3 juin 2022 14:59
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Reorganize maven-utilities repository into one
Hi,
The "
Hi,
The "BOM" (Bill of Materials) is a packaging that "defines the
versions of all the artifacts that will be created in the library. Other
projects that wish to use the library should import this POM into the
dependencyManagement section of their POM." [1]
So basically this will be a
Hi Antonio,
Do you have some information on this bom concept on maven? Not sure I
understand what it involve
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : antonio <>
Envoyé : jeudi 2 juin 2022 22:21
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Reorganize maven-utilities repo
+1 to this.
While we're at it, is a Maven BOM of any use?
Cheers,
Antonio
El 31/5/22 a las 19:18, Eric Barboni escribió:
I would like to regroup the maven-utilities repository back into one. I like
very much writing voting mail that are longer than the code changes but I would
prefer one
Envoyé : mardi 31 mai 2022 19:36
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org; Eric Barboni
Objet : Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Reorganize maven-utilities repository into one
+1 from me (if its not a lot of work)
i cloned all of them and constantly got confused what i was looking at :) This
would also avoid having t
SENSUS] Reorganize maven-utilities repository into one
+1 from me (if its not a lot of work)
i cloned all of them and constantly got confused what i was looking at :) This
would also avoid having to open separate PRs for changes which would usually
belong in one commit - and as you mentioned, fewer
+1 from me (if its not a lot of work)
i cloned all of them and constantly got confused what i was looking at :)
This would also avoid having to open separate PRs for changes which
would usually belong in one commit - and as you mentioned, fewer voting
threads.
-mbien
On 31.05.22 19:18, Eric
15 matches
Mail list logo
