On Sat, 27 Jan 2018, 22:36 Antonio, wrote:
> So we leave the wiki as is, right? (I'm confused)
>
Sorry! Not trying to confuse you - almost confused myself rereading that.
;-)
If we're going to do external wiki edits via pull requests as you suggest,
then we might as well use a standard git repo
Every few days I update and build current git repo of incubator netbeans.
I then configure to run with jdk9.
There are a lot of plugin options to choose from -
do we know how safe/reliable/bug-free the available plugins are at this
time ?
or which of the avail plugins should only be used at this
On 27/01/18 18:51, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 at 16:41 Antonio wrote:
Then could restrict wiki editing to the team, using the editor for
ourselves, and allow the world to submit PRs against 'X'.
If we're doing that and not allowing wider permissions, I don't see that we
gain
Hi Jan,
Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Bläsing > wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 15:12 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda:
> > >
> > > Does this relate only to things we have in source, or also to external
> >
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 at 16:41 Antonio wrote:
> Then could restrict wiki editing to the team, using the editor for
> ourselves, and allow the world to submit PRs against 'X'.
>
If we're doing that and not allowing wider permissions, I don't see that we
gain much by adding cloning between. Surely
On 27/01/18 17:04, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 at 17:56 Neil C Smith wrote:
I still haven't heard anything back from my email to infra@ to see
whether GitBox can handle syncing the wiki repo.
OK, had a reply on infra@. It looks like GitHub wikis are backed up via
GitBox, but
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Bläsing wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 15:12 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda:
> >
> > Does this relate only to things we have in source, or also to external
> > binaries?
>
> I'm only looking into the files in the repository. I'm touching the
>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 at 17:56 Neil C Smith wrote:
> I still haven't heard anything back from my email to infra@ to see
> whether GitBox can handle syncing the wiki repo.
>
OK, had a reply on infra@. It looks like GitHub wikis are backed up via
GitBox, but that it's hidden and (I think, asked for
Hi Jan,
Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 15:12 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda:
>
> Does this relate only to things we have in source, or also to external
> binaries?
I'm only looking into the files in the repository. I'm touching the
CreateLicenseSummary and VerifyLibsAndLicenses tasks for this.
> We are
Hi Matthias,
Does this relate only to things we have in source, or also to external
binaries? We are not attributing certain jars properly (e.g. some jars
embedded in Apache Maven are not under Apache License 2.0, even though our
license file says so). So I was peeking at that a little (we could e
Nice, thanks a lot!
Gj
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> please wait - I'm preparing a change to the way license and notice are
> generated and I think that should go in before another vote.
>
> I'll try to get a prototype out this weekend.
>
> Matthias
>
> Am S
Hey,
please wait - I'm preparing a change to the way license and notice are
generated and I think that should go in before another vote.
I'll try to get a prototype out this weekend.
Matthias
Am Samstag, den 27.01.2018, 14:54 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems to me that t
Hi all,
It seems to me that the main items identified by the IPMC vote have
been addressed:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+Beta+rc3
And thanks to Eric Barboni we now have a separate and well structured
Rat exclusions file, which should make reviews easie
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> I think we need a Wiki that lists all the items in Justin’s mail, each with
>> a separate row in a table, each pointing to an issue in Apache NetBeans
>> Issuezilla...
>
On Sat, 27 Jan 2018 at 08:51 Emilian Bold
wrote:
> Would be nice to also see this bug reported to SUSE so we can reference it
> in the future.
>
> I've looked into this a bit - I think we would need to provide a bit more
information to SUSE/Fedora to help them take some action. Unfortunately I
ha
Great Thing Jaroslav. Of Course we need more and better git support in
NetBeans, like the long asked feature for a visual git log like this:
https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/files/2011/11/log1.jpg. Only to let you know
that. This is of Course another topic and I will create a new ticket for this.
Hi devs,
if you want to get familiar with (part of) NetBeans code base and contribute
to development of this IDE, here is a quest:
Please take a look at my PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/
pull/391/files
It improves the "Show Git History" window to handle `git replace`. It is a
Would be nice to also see this bug reported to SUSE so we can reference it in
the future.
--emi
Original Message
On 21 January 2018 1:44 PM, Markus Kilås
wrote:
>On 01/20/2018 07:10 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
>>On Sat, 20 Jan 2018, 17:54 Glenn Holmer, ce...@kolabnow.com wrot
>There is no plan to release the sources since you can do this with the build
>in "New File Type"-Wizard on your own.
How can this be closed source when the licenses is listed as Apache 2.0 here
http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/55342/office-file-types?
--emi
Original Message -
This is pretty great.
--emi
Original Message
On 26 January 2018 6:47 PM, Antonio wrote:
>Hi all,
>
> As an experiment I've uploaded the NetBeans DevFaq wiki entries to
>
>https://github.com/vieiro/incubator-netbeans-website/wiki
>
> Which is associated with the git repo
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
