[Hibernate] - Issue Netbeans-171

Hi. There is a plan for a new Hibernate module? -- *Wilmar A. Giraldo Sanchez*

Re: NETBEANS-312: how to fix patches removing license headers?

Hi, I added my evaluation to the bug and created a related PR. Greetings Matthias Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2018, 10:15 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get ahead of a discussion we'll inevitable end up in if > we > don't deal with this before we try to do the

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

This email thread is also a form of brainstorming. I have no problems exploring ideas even if they never get implemented. Starting from my plan of increasing the vertical space available for actual code in the diff top component, several other ideas were explored: * the fact the even if we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Excellent. Gj On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Yes, last one (305) seems to now also got marked as resolved just a few > hours ago. > One more stone out of the way for a next NB release. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 10.05.2018 um 09:21

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Yes, last one (305) seems to now also got marked as resolved just a few hours ago. One more stone out of the way for a next NB release. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 10.05.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga > : > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Mark

Jigsaw modules as modules in NetBeans

Hi all, I remember a discussion with Jan at a Munich event about the possibility of using jigsaw modules within NetBeans. With the upcoming new JavaFX SDK (downloadable now) as modules this becomes an interesting approach for integrating JavaFX and NetBeans.. Any pointers maybe even a working

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

If there are configurable options to change it why do you care? You can just keep the settings how you like it and you will be happy. From what I read in the chain it sounds like this was a suggestion a while back. On Thu, 10 May 2018, 15:17 Matthias Bläsing, wrote: >

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2018, 09:25 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > Not sure why you have to be so adamant about this. Because you try to force your use-case down my throat. Yes I choose my hardware to get my work done and this worked good with netbeans. All I heard till now torpedes this. This is

Re: NETBEANS-410: Dealing with the remaining TestJDK.class

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > What's stopping us to delete it: is the .class file used? > > Like I've said, it's trivial. If we don't need it, let's delete it. > I think it is less about what the class is doing, and more how it was compiled.

Re: Let's branch Apache NetBeans 9.0

On Thu, 10 May 2018 at 13:10 Sven Reimers wrote: > +1 for branching. > > Concerning the var support PR's.. Do we already have a roadmap for the next > release? If it takes too long to integrate we could just move those fixes > to the next (Patch-)Release..? > +1 to

Re: NETBEANS-410: Dealing with the remaining TestJDK.class

It is used here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/blob/master/nbi/engine/src/org/netbeans/installer/utils/applications/JavaUtils.java ...and here:

Re: NETBEANS-410: Dealing with the remaining TestJDK.class

What's stopping us to delete it: is the .class file used? Like I've said, it's trivial. If we don't need it, let's delete it. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 10 May 2018 4:23 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Its not a question of licensing but of 

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Not sure why you have to be so adamant about this. I could add some flag per topcomponent that says 'no-individual-tab'. Then, if I have a floating window holding that single topcomponent it won't have the title bar. For people that need or are used to the old style we could have a checkbox in

Re: NETBEANS-410: Dealing with the remaining TestJDK.class

Its not a question of licensing but of compiled source code not being allowed to be in the release: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/73ce8a13d5c13b56c300e4aad1e9e9bc8351ea6e836f5dc60a55cfaa@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E Gj On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Emilian Bold

Re: NETBEANS-410: Dealing with the remaining TestJDK.class

How do we know the license for TestJDK? Was it not owned by Oracle and donated? Not sure where it's being used but by looking at the bytecode it's an absolutely trivial class we could rewrite at any time. It prints to System.out these system properties: * java.version * java.vm.version *

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 18:59 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > > That would be nice--but how would one dock the TopComponent again > > if there is no tab to right-click or drag? > > Closing the frame would dock the contained TopComponent "back". This breaks current behaviour where closing the

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

> Closing the frame would dock the contained TopComponent "back". Ah, not a bad idea! I assume dragging an additional tab into the frame would make tabs appear again. On 5/9/18, 6:59 PM, "Emilian Bold" wrote: >> That would be nice--but how would one dock the

Re: Let's branch Apache NetBeans 9.0

+1 for branching. Concerning the var support PR's.. Do we already have a roadmap for the next release? If it takes too long to integrate we could just move those fixes to the next (Patch-)Release..? Sven Geertjan Wielenga schrieb am Do., 10. Mai 2018, 12:39:

Re: Let's branch Apache NetBeans 9.0

Makes sense. Note there are several PRs that we need to include in the 9.0 release, e.g., related to 'var' support, but we can push those to the branch after merging into main. Gj On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Jiří Kovalský wrote: > Hi folks, > >since we only

Let's branch Apache NetBeans 9.0

Hi folks, since we only have two remaining 9.0 blockers [1] which are infrastructure related problems I suggest that we create releases/release90 branch from master. In order to fix #330 we need to update branding and test new location of the Update Center so I think the right time has

possible bug with dependency checker

I've looked around and cannot find the bug in jira, so i'm checking if it is already known. When i build a project (target jar) with do.depend=true for a second time after clean, the following is thrown: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Invalid Constant Pool entry Type 19 at

Re: NetBeans 2018W18 Weekly Report

Very nice. Gj On Thursday, May 10, 2018, John McDonnell wrote: > Need to tweak some stuff, was in a JUnit 5 chat room last night, found out > I made a slightly limited assumption around working out if a method is > testable or not, once that's resolved I'll commit and

Re: NetBeans 2018W18 Weekly Report

Need to tweak some stuff, was in a JUnit 5 chat room last night, found out I made a slightly limited assumption around working out if a method is testable or not, once that's resolved I'll commit and push :) John On 10 May 2018 at 09:40, Geertjan Wielenga

Re: NetBeans 2018W18 Weekly Report

Hi John, Great. Indeed, JUnit 5 support is highly desired, if we can get something in already for the 9.0 release, that would be nice to have -- and once your starting point is merged and your plans are discussed in a thread here, more will join in I'm sure. Gj On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:11 PM,

Re: NetBeans 2018W18 Weekly Report

It's a really cool idea to have a weekly update like this. Gj On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > This seems interesting. The mailing list seems like the proper place, I > would certainly not be reading about it on the wiki right now. > > I

NETBEANS-410: Dealing with the remaining TestJDK.class

Hi all, Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-410 There's still one .class file that we have not solved yet: nbi/engine/src/org/netbeans/installer/utils/applications/TestJDK.class It is still present:

NETBEANS-312: how to fix patches removing license headers?

Hi all, I'd like to get ahead of a discussion we'll inevitable end up in if we don't deal with this before we try to do the release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-312 That issue comes from the IPMC review by Justin McLean for the 2nd attempt at the Beta release:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > Had a talk with Jaroslav this morning at GeeCON about tasks we need to > resolve befor the next release. > > I just looked up the old thread. Those are the tickets we still need to > address. > The