Hi Mario,
I have written 3 language plugins for Netbeans. I think the answer to your
question depends on what you want to do, and what you already have in hand.
The Netbeans platform differentiates between support for lexing and support for
parsing. While I have not used JFlex, JFlex is a
I have no formal programming background. I've spent last two or three years
trying to learn lexers parsers. So, take what I say for what it's worth. After
banging my head against, JavaCC, Antlr and Rats! for a while, I came to the
conclusion that if one has never used any of those libraries
I've used ANTLR but also hand-made stuff.
And there are better smarter parsers nowadays. I think I was amazed about
`parboiled` at some point but never used it for something real.
--emi
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:37 PM Mario Schroeder
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would appreciate when someone could set
Hi,
I would appreciate when someone could set me on the right track. I'm
wondering what is the best way to write a plugin with a support for a new
language.
I have found this old tutorial:
http://wiki.netbeans.org/How_to_create_support_for_a_new_language
It uses JavaCC. The tutorial is linked to
ebarboni closed pull request #6: script git commit line typo
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/6
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a
At least two, see the end of this page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Transition
Gj
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:16 PM Tim Boudreau wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how many donations are left?
>
> -Tim
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 6:04 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> >
Out of curiosity, how many donations are left?
-Tim
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 6:04 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Oracle has handed over the grant document and ZIP providing the 3rd code
> donation to Apache. Apache is evaluating the grant document and we will
> proceed with the
The alternative, and I feel this is what Jirka would prefer, is to wait for
everything to be in the release100 branch, finished, complete, no blockers
at all, and only then put together a vc (i.e., vc3) for purposes of the
community acceptance survey.
However, given the shortness of the release
Excellent news!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:04 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Oracle has handed over the grant document and ZIP providing the 3rd code
> donation to Apache. Apache is evaluating the grant document and we will
> proceed with the content of the ZIP file after the document
I would suggest we start the community acceptance survey with 10-vcs2, yes,
we know that are those 4 specific blockers (again, two of them are not
things we're going to change ourselves, they're in the JDK), i.e., we know
about the other two specific problems -- the point is now to determine
Right -- and two of those blockers are duplicates, and caused by JDK
problems.
We know that more than likely we'll need to put together a third voting
candidate after this one, with this one, we can see most of the issues
being resolved, hopefully.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:14 PM Laszlo
Well, those blockers with PR-s are still under review/discussion.
The Windows Launchers are still pending. On contrary there were a lot of
fixes/cherry picks going on the release100 branch, especially on the PHP
side, so an updated release would be useful for the NetCat testers. I
know we
Thanks Geertjan. Great news!
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 6:17 AM, Antonio wrote:
>
> yipee!
>
> El 30/10/2018 a las 11:03, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:
>> Hi all,
>> Oracle has handed over the grant document and ZIP providing the 3rd code
>> donation to Apache. Apache is evaluating the grant
Excuse me but why are we creating VC2 if there are still 4 blockers [1]
open? Wouldn't it better to wait for the pull requests to be merged,
build the VC2 with the fixes and open the final Community Acceptance
survey then?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12345028
-Jirka
Excellent, will try it out as soon as I can. As many others as possible
too, please. Take it for a spin, any serious problems, please state them
here.
Gj
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is our second voting candidate for the 10.0 release of Apache
>
ebarboni opened a new pull request #6: script git commit line typo
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/6
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Hi all,
This is our second voting candidate for the 10.0 release of Apache NetBeans.
This build will go for validation through NetCAT process.
Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) constitutes all but the enterprise cluster in
the Apache NetBeans Git repo, which together provide the NetBeans
ebarboni closed pull request #5: use JDK 1.8 lastest for building site
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/5
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
ebarboni opened a new pull request #5: use JDK 1.8 lastest for building site
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/5
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ebarboni closed pull request #4: JenkinsFile script for site generation
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/4
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
ebarboni opened a new pull request #4: JenkinsFile script for site generation
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/4
Need to be tested on build.apache
This is an automated message from the Apache
ebarboni closed pull request #3: jenkinsfile to build website for the
mavenutils
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/3
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of
ebarboni opened a new pull request #3: jenkinsfile to build website for the
mavenutils
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/3
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
yipee!
El 30/10/2018 a las 11:03, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:
Hi all,
Oracle has handed over the grant document and ZIP providing the 3rd code
donation to Apache. Apache is evaluating the grant document and we will
proceed with the content of the ZIP file after the document has been
accepted
Great news!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:04 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Oracle has handed over the grant document and ZIP providing the 3rd code
> donation to Apache. Apache is evaluating the grant document and we will
> proceed with the content of the ZIP file after the document
ebarboni closed pull request #2: Update Branding and package to fit apache
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-mavenutils/pull/2
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As
Hi all,
Oracle has handed over the grant document and ZIP providing the 3rd code
donation to Apache. Apache is evaluating the grant document and we will
proceed with the content of the ZIP file after the document has been
accepted by Apache.
The code donated by means of the 3rd donation contains
Ashes on my head, you are Right. Thx to pointing it up, one more time :D
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Oktober 2018 10:13
An: dev
Betreff: Re: High level status of Apache NetBeans
At this point, you really shouldn't be asking this anymore -- not sure how
often I have provided
At this point, you really shouldn't be asking this anymore -- not sure how
often I have provided a link to this page. :-)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Transition
You'll see community-ruby is in there as well as contrib. In the interview,
I think I made a mistake
Great interview. Got new Infos, didn’t know that Ruby and Python will be
donated to Apache too, if I’ve understood it Right.
What About the contrib repo? There are a lot of cool and nice stuff, which is
still not part of the core.
Cheers
Chris
On 2018/10/24 22:13:41, Geertjan Wielenga
30 matches
Mail list logo
