Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Hi, My personal opinion only: On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz wrote: > Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss > it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never > happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption

NetBeans on Chromebooks

Android Studio is coming to Chromebooks next year: https://www.xda-developers.com/android-studio-chromebooks-chrome-os/ So... this means NetBeans should be able to run just as well. I have a couple of Chromebooks but only the newer ones support the Linux container capable of running an IDE. Woul

AW: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came up which is annoying. The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear

Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Hello, guys! I downloaded Netbeans VC3 today, I've been using it since VC1 for my day-to-day work and it has worked perfectly. But in VC3 I came across a detail that was not happening in VC2. Search and replace is with a bug, which I already reported on Jira as well ( https://issues.apache.org/ji

Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Hi Emilian, In response to your question, from my point of view, if we release on any date in November, that would be awesome, regardless if it's exactly the middle of the month (seems unlikely) or a week or so later. Gj On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Emilian Bold wrote: > I don't suppose the

Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Well, well, As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it became a BLOCKER... As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really subjective.) I'm not really happy about that, in the

Re: recommendation for language support

Hello NetBeaners, I finished my grammar based on ANTLR. The current version satisfies me. However since it is my first attempt I would highly appreciate if someone from this thread could have a look and comment if something could be improved. I know that you guys might be busy with the new release

Not possible to upload NetBeans plugins to the Plugin Portal.

Hello, at least since yesterday it is not possible to upload the JRebel NetBeans plugin to the Plugins Portal. The errors are as follows. * ERROR: archive seems to be missing Info/info.xml manifest file * Error: There is moduleauthor attribute missing in the manifest file. See wiki for

AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586 Cheers Chris Von: Geertjan Wielenga Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36 An: dev Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too earl

AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Afaik, there is still one blocker left with a PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/1012 Cheers Chris Von: Geertjan Wielenga Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36 An: dev Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early

Not possible to upload NetBeans plugins to the Plugin Portal.

Hello, at least since yesterday it is not possible to upload the JRebel NetBeans plugin to the Plugins Portal. The errors are as follows. * ERROR: archive seems to be missing Info/info.xml manifest file * Error: There is moduleauthor attribute missing in the manifest file. See wiki for m

Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources, since we're still running the survey on the binary. But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up another voting candidate (wh

Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?! > (remember, Apache does

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

+1 (binding) Thanks for the windows launcher. This is clean now :D Regards Eric Eric BARBONI | Research Assistant | T : 33.561.55.6964 ICS Team | IRIT | 118 route de Narbonne | 31062 Toulouse | France eric.barb...@irit.fr -Message d'origine- De : Josh Juneau Envoyé : mercredi 7 novem

Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Is there any documentation on how to build binaries? For Mac OSX? Cheers, Slim On 2018-11-07 06:08, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected > over here: > > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

*+1 (binding)* *Runtime:* Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 1.8.0_171-b11 *System:* Mac OS X version 10.13.6 running on x86_64; UTF-8; en_US (nb) Josh Juneau juneau...@gmail.com http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12

RE: VC3 - JDK11 - gradle plugin

Submitted issue with plugin...getting out of memory error. Thanks for the help. Running under JDK8, not having any issues. Mike -Original Message- From: Laszlo Kishalmi Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 6:17 PM To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: VC3 - JDK11 - gradle plu

Re: bits.netbeans.org / javadocs / mavenutils

Hi Eric, I think the point is that javadoc is published automatically. For instance, for the apex-core project, see https://ci.apache.org/projects/apex-core/apex-core-javadoc-release-3.4/index.html Anyway feel free to ask whatever questions you consider to the JIRA ticket with Infra. They kn

Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right? So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right? --emi On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wiel

Re: bits.netbeans.org / javadocs / mavenutils

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 00:26, Antonio wrote: > I think it's a great idea, is it ok if I request one of these for us and > we give it a go? +1 from me. The docs repo was meant to be a quick solution to getting NB9 and NB10 Javadocs hosted, away from the main site gitpubsub, while the long term pla

Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid

Hi all, Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected over here: https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3. We'

RE: bits.netbeans.org / javadocs / mavenutils

Hi Antonio I did not get the point here. What is the difference using between build.apache.org vs buildbot.apache ? Why do we need another type of ci ? Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Antonio Envoyé : mercredi 7 novembre 2018 01:26 À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Objet : R

AW: [Mentors] Removing old vote candidate bits?

Hey Laszlo, where do you remove it? Cheers Chris Von: Laszlo Kishalmi Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. November 2018 20:25 An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Mentors] Removing old vote candidate bits? Hi all! While releasing NetBeans 10.0-vc3 I've removed the old releases as well.