Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

2019-03-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
I have no vote in this matter, but as a member of the IPMC I want to state how I would vote if I did: I would vote -0... I am somewhat concerned about how the NB's PPMC defines and awards merit. Merit is based on what people do, and have done. Not based on expected or anticipated effort. Also,

Re: Apache-Netbeans-9.0-MacOSX

2018-08-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
I also have a 20 line shell script to do > it for NEXTbeans Retina.app > > The problem next is pushing this to infra, adding a builds task and getting > mac build slaves for Jenkins. > > --emi > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On 31 July 2018 4:42 PM, Jim Jagielski

Re: Apache-Netbeans-9.0-MacOSX

2018-07-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thank you! Yes, being able to use your script in order to create community builds of NetBean would be a major help! Even better, as you say, would be it being donated to the ASF to allow it to be bundled with the project as well. Even though it is licensed under the ALv2, and we could just "fold

Re: Netbeans 9.0 mac installer forever lost?

2018-07-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
One of the things I do with Apache Open Office is make the (community) macOS builds... Do you all want/need something like that for NetBeans? > On Jul 30, 2018, at 8:13 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Everything is part of the donation. But not everything is donated yet. > > Gj > > > On

Re: Does the software grant really need to be signed before code check in?

2017-01-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
I think, for the most part, that was only true when the code committed was under ALv2 > On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:21 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > I agree with you and that's how we've been proceeding. But, what does this > mean in the thread pointed out by

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans code donation

2016-12-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1... Having some more easily accessed and public info would be useful. > On Dec 23, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: >> ...Hard to give a time estimate for