Re: Installers

Hi Carl, I’m sorry that you saw Tim as blasting you. I have worked Tim and know him very well and I know he does not operate that way. I can see the “advice” he was offering as being relevant at the time it was made. It is possible that things have changed and the history that Tim is relaying

Re: A round of applause for Matthias!

Here here!!! > On Jun 19, 2018, at 8:32 AM, Emilian Bold > wrote: > > Hello, > > Maybe you haven't noticed but Matthias methodically worked on almost all the > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 > license issues and is about done with the latest PR.

Re: Microsoft buys GitHub

What GitHub brings to the table are the review and collaboration tools. If you don’t need them, then you don’t need GitHub. Kind regards, Kirk > On Jun 7, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > We’re using GitHub as a convenience, thanks to GitBox. But there’s no > requirement to

Re: Microsoft buys GitHub

Hi Jim, >> >> John > > > I’m sorry, but as a professor who has had to spend the bulk of his teaching > career telling students to not use MS products because they don’t follow > standards, I’m on the other side, condemn the news until they prove they > aren’t the useless organization they have

Re: Microsoft buys GitHub

I say good for GitHub.. I don’t think MS will be a problem… At least not right away. And if they are, it’s pretty easy to move to a new git home. — Kirk > On Jun 5, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Peter Cheung wrote: > > Codeplex, nokia, robotVM, all dead > > > From:

Re: Usability study was: Think Java, not Electron! was: Apache HTML/Java UI

Wow, I just read the blog post and I have to say… wow…… this blog really speaks the truth. We have JS engine embedded into the JVM. Is it unusable? — Kirk > On Mar 18, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Kirk Pepperdine <k...@kodewerk.com> wrote: > > >> On Mar 18, 2018, at 2:57 PM,

Re: Usability study was: Think Java, not Electron! was: Apache HTML/Java UI

> On Mar 18, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Kirk, > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 at 08:12 Kirk Pepperdine <k...@kodewerk.com> wrote: > >> There are entire classes of applications that cannot be easily managed in >> HTML t

Re: Usability study was: Think Java, not Electron! was: Apache HTML/Java UI

There are entire classes of applications that cannot be easily managed in HTML today. HTML/JS simply doesn’t scale in it’s current incantation. Without Swing/FX there are no good alternatives in Java. Regards, Kirk > On Mar 18, 2018, at 12:38 AM, Gili T. wrote: > > I

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans

Awesome news!!! > On Jan 23, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta rc2 passed the PPMC vote, though > during the IPMC vote a number of issues were identified. > > These issues are listed here: > >

Re: [EVENT] NetBeans Day London

Hi Ovi, I would love to be considered as a speaker. Kind regards, Kirk Pepperdine > On Jan 17, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Ovidijus Okinskas <o...@idrsolutions.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are organising NetBeans Day UK 2018 in London and are looking for speakers > t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc1

+1 I’ve been building VisualVM plugins and running them with this version. > On Jan 11, 2018, at 4:54 AM, John Brock wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I was able to install, load AnagramGame, build and run on Windows 10. > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:00 PM cowwoc

Re: Debugging issues in nightly build

> > > On 31 December 2017 at 12:57, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Just to be clear, can you point to what you're using as a nightly >> build, i.e., where are you getting it from exactly? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gj

Debugging issues in nightly build

Hi all, I’ve started testing NetBeans nightly build using VisualVM 1.4 as a platform. At the moment I am unable to run my simple VisualVM plugin inside the IDE. I’m able to create a NBM, load it into VVM and it all checks out. I’ve now done this on two different OS X machines. The error that