Hi,
Kicking off a Discussion thread for the new vote thread :)
When Im checking the Licence file I noticed 2 possible issues:
1. Near the end of the file it has:
platform/o.n.swing.plaf/src/org/netbeans/swing/plaf/util/SmoothScrollPaneUI.java
Apache
Thanks a lot for starting this discussion thread.
For these two items mentioned I’d recommend just filing issues, they’re
minor IMHO though great in the sense that they indicate everything else is
in a good state.
Gj
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, John McDonnell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kicking off a
The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook till tomorrow
night).
Point 1: The .java file is ALv2, but not donated to the Apache foundation
(adapted from Idea if I recall correctly). We need the licenseinfo.xml for the
notice file, but could suppress ALv2 output in license gener
Cool,
I'll try to raise an idea when I get home tonight but other than that I
didnt see any other issues with the release... so I'll vote tonight after I
create the issues...
John
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 13:12, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook
@Matthias as requested, I have opened NETBEANS-1803[1], I agree its not
blocking the release, so will vote now.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1803
John
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 17:26, John McDonnell
wrote:
> Cool,
>
> I'll try to raise an idea when I get home tonight but ot
Just about this vote thread. This will be open for at least 72+ hours
I'm going to close it 20st of December in the evening PST.
After that I'm going to start another thread on
gene...@incubator.apache.org carrying over the votes and binding votes
of our IPMC members, that thread shall be ope
Perfect and makes sense to me.
Thanks,
Gj
On Wednesday, December 19, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> Just about this vote thread. This will be open for at least 72+ hours I'm
> going to close it 20st of December in the evening PST.
>
> After that I'm going to start another thread on
> gene...@i
Hi Emilian,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2018, 09:49 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold:
> The DEPENDENCIES, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files look fine but I am
> mildly annoyed that the NOTICE file mentions 'IntelliJ IDEA Community
> Edition' for a single file (SmoothScrollPaneUI.java) which is under
> Apache 2.0.
Hey Neil,
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 17:59 + schrieb Neil C Smith:
> Minor niggle - one failure in RAT report, but *not* a license issue
> (webcommon/javascript2.jquery/external/jquery-api.xml)
please ensure, that you run the rat report on a clean source tree. The
file you are refering to i
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 21:33 Matthias Bläsing please ensure, that you run the rat report on a clean source tree.
>
Yes, I realised I'd done that a minute after posting. :-) Just didn't want
to correct in the vote thread while it was live. Sorry about the noise.
Best wishes,
Neil
>
Hi Emilian,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2018, 09:49 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold:
> I was just grep-ing for GPL and found
> ./platform/o.n.core/licenses/LICENSE.txt which mentions that
>
> > The Common Development and Distribution License
> > (CDDL), Version 1.0 governs your use of:
> > NetBeans Platfor
Dear Tushar,
The release does not come with SHA1 checksums. We are using SHA512 only
and the checksum files are next to their corresponding zip files.
The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
On 12/17/18 11:57 PM, John McDonnell wrote:
Hi,
Kicking off a Discussi
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 16:26, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
Do we really need that in future? Just caused me a double-take too!
Best wishes,
Neil
-
To unsubscrib
> The SHA1 provided in the mail is exclusively for the README.md file.
That SHA1 confused me too.
The SHA512 for the release artefact seems quite essential. Somebody
changing the artefact can easily update the hash too, but if the hash
is publicly listed in the email then it's almost impossible t
14 matches
Mail list logo
