On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)...
>
> +1 on the release of this archive:
>
> SHA1(incubating-netbea
Many thanks Bertrand.
The vote result thread is here (just as I finished working on it, your +1
arrived, great timing!):
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/278b3bd85eaeec8718dee95f9b2b2c2c7656544fb5b504f6b8e2632c@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
Thanks,
Gj
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Bert
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)...
+1 on the release of this archive:
SHA1(incubating-netbeans-platform-9.0-alpha-source.zip)=
1189b293cecfd5236cf18df2c2bd0f6b414dab75
which is found under
https:
+1 for me
On 2017-11-07 14:11, Martin Balin wrote:
> +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)>
>
> Martin Balin>
>
> On 7.11.2017 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:>
> > Hi all,>
> >>
> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this>
>
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Here we go: +1 (binding)
>
> This release candidate looks pretty good to me, nice work everyone!
>
Many thanks indeed!
Created these two issues from your comments below:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-157
https://issues.apac
Here we go: +1 (binding)
This release candidate looks pretty good to me, nice work everyone!
But of course, there's always something to nitpick about :-)
I checked the rat output and noticed one oddity:
nbi/infra/utils/comment-correcter/cddl.txt
That looks like a default comment template file
Hi Bertrand,
Thanks for looking at the candidate.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)!...
>
> I have started reviewing
> SHA1(in
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)!...
I have started reviewing
SHA1(incubating-netbeans-platform-9.0-alpha-source.zip)=
1189b293cecfd5236cf18df2c2bd0f6b414dab75
It's a big thing...I won't have time
No, that's fine, this evening would be excellent, thanks a lot Ate.
Gj
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-11-17 10:44, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
>> Excellent, thanks.
>>
>> It seems to me we have everything in place to go ahead with the IPMC vote.
>>
>> It would b
On 2017-11-17 10:44, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Excellent, thanks.
It seems to me we have everything in place to go ahead with the IPMC vote.
It would be useful though if one or our mentors would check through
everything first, especially since this is the first time we're doing this
for this p
Hi,
I would love to see the javadocs for the platform in future releases,
these are very useful for NBRCP developers.
Cheers,
Antonio
P.S.: Building the javadocs is not very eco-friendly, so it's better to
create them once per release instead of once per developer. ;-)
On 17/11/17 10:44, G
Excellent, thanks.
It seems to me we have everything in place to go ahead with the IPMC vote.
It would be useful though if one or our mentors would check through
everything first, especially since this is the first time we're doing this
for this part of Apache NetBeans. I'd feel more comfortable
Hi,
So I:
-added a KEYS file with my key (I have it also registered on id.apache.org,
but it will take time before it propagates):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/KEYS
-and added the release candidate files here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/i
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> For the IPMC vote, I'd suppose it might be good to actually stage the
> release (signed and with hashes):
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#stage
>
> IMO if the only thing we need to change is the filename, it should be
> enough
Was about to post an email with the link to issue 144 when I saw that
Lars had already sent it X^D
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-144
2017-11-16 9:21 GMT+01:00 Lars Bruun-Hansen :
> Was about to create this when I saw that Antonio had already created it in
> JIRA. :-)
>
> https://
Was about to create this when I saw that Antonio had already created it in
JIRA. :-)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-144
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Antonio wrote:
> > The "About Dialog" of a NB RCP Appl
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Antonio wrote:
> The "About Dialog" of a NB RCP Application...
...
> b) Shows a text stating that the NetBeans Platform is released under the
> CDDL/GPL+CPE
I don't think it's required to change that before the first release,
I'd say just create a jira t
The "About Dialog" of a NB RCP Application...
a) Shows an image where the CCDL/GPL + CPE is still there.
b) Shows a text stating that the NetBeans Platform is released under the
CDDL/GPL+CPE.
I think the image is also on the splash screen.
Should that be changed before release?
Cheers,
Anton
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> ...the file name will need to
> be changed in the hash file as well/the hash files will need to be
> regenerated, although the hash itself should remain the same...
That's fine - we vote on hashes, not filenames, though having the
right name fr
For the IPMC vote, I'd suppose it might be good to actually stage the
release (signed and with hashes):
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#stage
IMO if the only thing we need to change is the filename, it should be
enough to rename before committing to the SVN (the file name will need
That means we need to make a new artifact with that name and start a new
vote thread here for that artifact?
Or do we start a vote thread at the IPMC with the newly named artifact?
Thanks,
Gj
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Geertj
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ..."Shouldn't the name of the ZIP start with "incubating" ?
As per http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html -
"Release artifacts must include incubating in the final file name"
-Bertrand
Before we go to the IPMC vote, there's another question that needs an
answer by Jaroslav Tulach above: "Shouldn't the name of the ZIP start with
"incubating" ? I think that is a
requirement somewhere in the release documents."
Gj
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele
OK, I think we have all the info we need -- I'm going to put the IPMC vote
thread together.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> Isn't the solution to write to the README.md (maybe just next time) that
> one has to:
>
> ./platform/lib/nbexec --userdir /tmp/testuserdir
>
Isn't the solution to write to the README.md (maybe just next time) that
one has to:
./platform/lib/nbexec --userdir /tmp/testuserdir
(if that works on all platforms)?
-jt
2017-11-15 15:23 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Jan L
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> My personal opinion: seems the main issue here is that the nbexec expects
> to get userdir (and cache dir) from the product/application launcher. If
> that's good or bad, that I guess is a question to NetBeans Platform
> architects, but this (a
My personal opinion: seems the main issue here is that the nbexec expects
to get userdir (and cache dir) from the product/application launcher. If
that's good or bad, that I guess is a question to NetBeans Platform
architects, but this (as far as I can tell) is not really anything new in
this relea
8)
--emi
> Original Message
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
>attempt
>Local Time: November 15, 2017 3:45 PM
>UTC Time: November 15, 2017 1:45 PM
>From: emilian.b...@protonmail.ch
>To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
>attempt
>Local Time: November 15, 2017 3:38 PM
>UTC Time: November 15, 2017 1:38 PM
>From: geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com
>To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
>OK, makes sense.
>
> Still, we need to figure
OK, makes sense.
Still, we need to figure out what the problem is that Chris describes in
this thread.
Gj
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 at 13:17, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, the question woul
> On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, the question would be why it is useful.
> >
> > And what does it prove -- and is it a requirement for release.
>
What does it show if the launcher isn't working? That you cannot start
plat
Hi Gj !
No sorry, I'm not able to reproduce on Windows Server 2012 R2.
- Ralph
D:\netbeans Platform\platform\lib>nbexec --help
Usage: launcher {options} arguments
General options:
--helpshow this help
--jdkhome path to JDK
-Jpass to JVM
--cp:p prepen
+1
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017, 9:23 AM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Also, can someone on Windows reproduce the problem Chris describes in this
> thread?
>
> Gj
>
> On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Wel
Also, can someone on Windows reproduce the problem Chris describes in this
thread?
Gj
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well, the question would be why it is useful.
>
> And what does it prove -- and is it a requirement for release.
>
Well, the question would be why it is useful.
And what does it prove -- and is it a requirement for release.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> 2017-11-14 20:32 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>:
>
> > Calling the exe doesn’t really mak
2017-11-14 20:32 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>:
> Calling the exe doesn’t really make sense. Who/why would one do this.
>
Why it doesn't make sense? Calling platform/lib/nbexec.exe shall start the
platform. Calling platform/lib/nbexec does so on Unix.
-jt
+1
Regards,
Junichi
2017-11-14 7:01 GMT+09:00 Geertjan Wielenga :
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
> this ve
calling ‚ant tryme‘ everything was fine. Didn’t try ‚ant‘.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>
> Von: John McDonnell
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 17:32
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release A
calling ‚ant tryme‘ everything was fine. Didn’t try ‚ant‘.
Cheers
Chris
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: John McDonnell
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 17:32
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
attempt
@Christian
sendet von Mail für Windows 10
>>
>> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 14:09
>> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
>> attempt
>>
>> Unzip it an
> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>
> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 14:09
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
> attempt
>
> Unzip it and run 'ant tryme&#x
: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
attempt
Unzip it and run 'ant tryme' in the root: https://github.com/
apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/265
Gj
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> No launc
ich doesn‘t
>>
>>
>> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>>
>> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 13:59
>> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
&g
doesn‘t
>
>
> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>
> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 13:59
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
> attempt
>
> Nope. Without
er 2017 13:58
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
> attempt
>
> Build it via ant. Run it via 'ant tryme' in the root directory, i.e., where
> you ran ant.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 a
.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
> attempt
>
> Build it via ant. Run it via 'ant tryme' in the root directory, i.e., where
> you ran ant.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Christian Lenz
>
But the prebuild should also work, or not?
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 13:58
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
attempt
Build it via ant. Run it via
ads\netbeans\platform\lib)
> cannot reside inside your NetBeans installation directory
> (C:\Users\UserName\Downloads\netbeans).
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Josh Juneau
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 13:09
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
s\UserName\Downloads\netbeans\platform\lib) cannot
reside inside your NetBeans installation directory
(C:\Users\UserName\Downloads\netbeans).
Cheers
Chris
Von: Josh Juneau
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 13:09
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans
+1
-Message d'origine-
De : Arunava Sinha [mailto:arunava.si...@oracle.com]
Envoyé : mardi 14 novembre 2017 13:36
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt
+1
On 11/14/2017 3:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
+1
On 11/14/2017 3:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBeans
+1
On 11/14/2017 3:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBeans
+1 Go for it.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Josh Juneau
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2017 13:09
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd
attempt
+1
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
+1
Thanks,
Reema
On 11/14/2017 5:39 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
+1
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__jj-2Dblogger.blogspot.com&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=I_-Y15BecdUmuYLJbvbi0hFUs7JgHZnV_jPFSP8DQF0&m=hii86L77A9IXdkHUr
+1
-Jirka
Dne 13.11.2017 v 23:01 Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a):
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apac
+1
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubatin
+1
On 11/14/2017 3:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBeans
+1
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Gj
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Jaroslav Tulach <
> jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (informational)
> >
> > >> Geertjan Wielenga : 13.11.17 @
> 22:01
> > <<
> > > https:
+1
Gj
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> +1 (informational)
>
> >> Geertjan Wielenga : 13.11.17 @ 22:01
> <<
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-r
> > elease/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
>
>
+1 (informational)
>> Geertjan Wielenga : 13.11.17 @ 22:01 <<
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-r
> elease/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
Shouldn't the name of the ZIP start with "incubating" ? I think that is a
require
+1
+1
--emi
+1
Am 13. November 2017 23:01:57 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga
:
>Hi all,
>
>Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
>this
>voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
>release
>this versio
+1
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Ludovic HOCHET wrote:
> +1
> built from source
> then ant tryme
> then confirmed with the test project from Antonio
>
> On 13 November 2017 at 23:34, Antonio wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm attaching a very small 2Kb example NetBeans project that uses the
> > plat
+1
built from source
then ant tryme
then confirmed with the test project from Antonio
On 13 November 2017 at 23:34, Antonio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a very small 2Kb example NetBeans project that uses the
> platform for running.
>
> Instructions:
> a) Unzip the platform at X somewhere.
> b)
Hi,
I'm attaching a very small 2Kb example NetBeans project that uses the
platform for running.
Instructions:
a) Unzip the platform at X somewhere.
b) Open the NetBeans IDE and choose Tools/NetBeans Platforms. Add the
platform at 'X' to the list of platforms.
c) Unzip the TEST.tgz attached p
Never mind, found it:
>From Linux:
$ cd netbeans/platform/lib/
$ ./nbexec
Don't see any issues, so +1 (non binding)
On 13 November 2017 at 22:17, John McDonnell wrote:
>> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
>> the NetBeans Platform:
>>
>> https://builds.ap
> Included as a convenience is a binary, unzip it and run it and you'll see
> the NetBeans Platform:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/79/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-bin-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
How does one "run" the platform?
Regards
John
+1
El 13/11/17 a las 23:01, Geertjan Wielenga escribió:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBe
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) constitutes the modules of Apach
El 08/11/17 a las 21:36, Jan Lahoda escribió:
> [...]
-delete inclusion of jsearch.jar in apisupport.harness (should be trivial
by itself)
Jan, will something like
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/263 do?
Cheers,
Antonio
Yup, agreed.
Great work, thanks.
Gj
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 at 21:36, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Thanks Ate, I tried to clean up the notice fragments here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
>
> Overall, what we need to fix seems to be:
> -the notices:
> https://github.com/apache/incu
Thanks Ate, I tried to clean up the notice fragments here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
Overall, what we need to fix seems to be:
-the notices:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/261
-change the cluster.config in the source zip so that it only refers to the
+1
guest it's three counting on.
cheers
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ubject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
+1
On 2017-11-07 05:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,>
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If
> this> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
> ge
On 2017-11-08 11:18, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi Ate,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
I get a different build error:
BUILD FAILED
/home/ate/t
+ 1
built from source and tryme went fine.
On 7 November 2017 at 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> Hi Ate,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>
>> I get a different build error:
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/ne
On 2017-11-08 07:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi Ate,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
I get a different build error:
BUILD FAILED
/home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
Download of
2760
+1
Regards,
Georgia
+1 from me also…..
> On 8 Nov 2017, at 08:19, mario-leander.rei...@qaware.de wrote:
>
> +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
>
-1, until we resolve these issues reported by Ate.
Thanks, Ate, for reporting them,
Antonio
P.S.: I'll have some time tonight (EU time) to help solve them.
2017-11-08 0:04 GMT+01:00 Ate Douma :
> I get a different build error:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-pl
+1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
+1 => let the bits attract attention of those who have bindings votes.
I have noticed few problems with the build as well. Reported as
NETBEANS-128 and NETBEANS-129. None of them is related to licensing, so I
think none of them shall stop the process of getting the 1st draft of alpha
version out.
+1
Thanks,
Reema
On 11/7/2017 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version.
A
Hi Ate,
Thanks a lot for your review and comments.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> I get a different build error:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
> Download of
> 276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC71230
+1
On 2017-11-07 05:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,>
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this>
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on>
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release>
> this version.>
+1
El nov. 7, 2017 6:28 PM, "Attila Kelemen"
escribió:
+1 (binding)
2017-11-07 11:17 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started o
+1 (binding)
2017-11-07 11:17 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too,
I get a different build error:
BUILD FAILED
/home/ate/tmp/netbeans/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/nbbuild/build.xml:122:
Download of
276009D3F0A27079A80D241C3183EC712305A42A-net.java.html.boot.script-1.5.jar
produced content with hash 5DE9DD70EDCD9B30E0671ACC813F6F0C80E951AA when
g with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy
> src and
> >> the jemmy doc) with the platform.
> >>
> >> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017
> NetBeans
> >> but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
> >>
> >&
t; block,
>> >> but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy
>> src and
>> >> the jemmy doc) with the platform.
>> >>
>> >> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017
>> NetBeans
>> >> bu
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Junichi
2017-11-07 19:17 GMT+09:00 Geertjan Wielenga :
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)! If this
> voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can releas
pache license is shown in a code block,
>> but nothing wrong with it. Not sure why we ship jemmy (and the jemmy src and
>> the jemmy doc) with the platform.
>>
>> NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017 NetBeans
>> but Copyright 2017 the ASF?
+1
Joerg
I want to vote yes, but should the sources be buildable?
If I execute ant the build fails?
$ ant
...
[insert-module-all-targets] This module is missing from checkout:
maven.apisupport - at least can't find:
/Users/john/Downloads/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha/maven.apisupport/build.x
+1
Joerg
SF?
--emi
Original Message
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:27 PM
UTC Time: November 7, 2017 5:27 PM
From: toni.ep...@eppleton.de
To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
+1
Am 07.11.17, 11:17 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga&
+1
But the link to the artifact is broken. It should be:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/netbeans-platform-source-platform-9.0-alpha.zip
On 2017-11-07 11:17, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,>
>
> Please vote
y src and the
jemmy doc) with the platform.
NOTICE file. Our own html4j binaries should not be Copyright 2017 NetBeans but
Copyright 2017 the ASF?
--emi
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)
> Local Time: November 7
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
