> On 23 Jun 2017, at 8:25 pm, Hermien Pellissier wrote:
>
>
>> Can we please add in xml-api as well? I’ve recently added in an improvement
>> to Netbeans and I used xml-schema and xml-code as they seemed the best fit.
>
> I have created the component. :)
Thanks!
>
>>
Hi Ross,
> Can we please add in xml-api as well? I’ve recently added in an improvement
> to Netbeans and I used xml-schema and xml-code as they seemed the best fit.
I have created the component. :)
> It’s probably not a priority, but can I suggest we establish a document which
> allows a
gt;
>> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>>
>> Von: Hermien Pellissier
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2017 14:38
>> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
>>
>>> Do you mean These descriptions
> And here is the list of components together with their descriptions. Some
> are not very much descriptive so you can freely improve these if you know
> their meaning well.
Thank you!
~Hermien
: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2017 14:38
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
Do you mean These descriptions?
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__netbeans.org_bugzilla_enter-5Fbug.cgi=DwIFaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10
> Yes, really excellent, thanks a lot. I also added "platform - HTML4J", as
> requested by Jaroslav above, and "web - Oracle JET".
You're most welcome. And thanks for adding those additional two components!
~ Hermien
>> All done. I was distracted a number of times, so I might have missed
>> one or two. But I have worked through the full list.
>
> Just checked and you got all of them Hermien, didn't miss a single one.
Awesome! :D Thanks for checking!
~ Hermien
> > Dne 8.6.2017 v 14:41 Christian Lenz napsal(a):
> >>
> >> Ok yes, the description could be find on the right too for those second
> >> Level components.
> >>
> >> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
> >>
> >> Von: Hermien Pellissier
&g
Mail für Windows 10
Von: Hermien Pellissier
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2017 14:38
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
Do you mean These descriptions?
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__netbeans.org_bugzilla_enter-5Fbug.cgi
Ok yes, the description could be find on the right too for those second Level
components.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Hermien Pellissier
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2017 14:38
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
> Do you m
> Do you mean These descriptions?
>
> https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi Right behind the component.
Thanks! That answers the first question.
We need one level deeper actually - like the ones you get if you click
on the components on this page:
All done. I was distracted a number of times, so I might have missed
one or two. But I have worked through the full list.
None of the components have descriptions. Were there descriptions in
Bugzilla? Do we want to keep those? And can they be exported?
~ Hermien
Brilliant. :-)
Gj
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Hermien Pellissier
wrote:
> > Let's do it -- you'll notice it's very easy. Hermien is available for
> this
> > as indicated and I'll take a look tomorrow or so to see whether any are
> > missing or need to be added. Yes,
> Let's do it -- you'll notice it's very easy. Hermien is available for this
> as indicated and I'll take a look tomorrow or so to see whether any are
> missing or need to be added. Yes, everything is easy to edit.
Reporting for duty. :) I will start at the bottom of the list.
~ Hermien
Great, so we have the go ahead for this.
Let's do it -- you'll notice it's very easy. Hermien is available for this
as indicated and I'll take a look tomorrow or so to see whether any are
missing or need to be added. Yes, everything is easy to edit.
By sometime during the weekend, at latest,
Hi team,
I agree with the structure although this way the list will be very
long. I would maybe suggest to reduce "-- Other --" only to "Other" but
I see this can be edited later too.
Thanks,
-Jirka
Dne 8.6.2017 v 10:45 Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a):
That's excellent, many thanks.
I
That's excellent, many thanks.
I have made you, John McDonnell and Jirka Kovalsky administrators of Apache
NetBeans JIRA, together with the two who were already administrators --
Bertrand Delacretaz and myself.
I'd like to wait for Jirka's agreement with the component structure before
we go
> Jiri and John, I have taken John's suggestion and, as a start, have created
> four components:
> apisupport - API docs
> apisupport - Harness
> apisupport - Maven
> apisupport - Project
I think this is a good component structure.
> I'll also give permissions to Jirka, Hermien, John, and anyone
Thanks, continuing the discussion on the other thread.
Gj
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> >...we're looking
> > for guidance on the
Bertrand, many thanks.
Jiri and John, I have taken John's suggestion and, as a start, have created
four components:
apisupport - API docs
apisupport - Harness
apisupport - Maven
apisupport - Project
Please confirm that the above is what we want to do, then I'll add all the
other components in
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>...we're looking
> for guidance on the creation of products/components in JIRA...
I gave you more rights, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/NETBEANS
-Bertrand
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...I don't believe I have access to create components either...
I changed your user role, you should be able to do stuff now at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/NETBEANS
Hi mentors,
See the "Products/Components structure for JIRA" thread -- we're looking
for guidance on the creation of products/components in JIRA.
This has some urgency -- the community-driven test community (NetCAT)
requires specific categories to be available in JIRA so that the
t; >>>
>> >>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Christian Lenz <
>> christian.l...@gmx.net>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> When I have a look in my tickets, there are a lot of tickets, where
>> no one
>> &
>>> manually duplicated in JIRA a linked back to original Bugzilla issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jirka
>>>>>
>>>>> Dne 13.5.2017 v 11:47 Cezariusz Marek napsal(a):
>>>>>
>>>>> What about open issues? How are
arn't. Most of the time those tickets are
feature requests. That should be handled by jira too and not gettings
lost.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Mai 2017 um 11:12 Uhr
Von: "Jiří Kovalský" <jiri.koval...@oracle.com>
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Products/Components
"Jiří Kovalský" <jiri.koval...@oracle.com>
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
I believe that those which will be worked on by somebody will be
manually duplicated in JIRA a linked back to original Bugzilla issue.
-Jirka
are feature requests.
That should be handled by jira too and not gettings lost.
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Mai 2017 um 11:12 Uhr
> Von: "Jiří Kovalský" <jiri.koval...@oracle.com>
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
&g
Marek
-Original Message-
From: Jiří Kovalský [mailto:jiri.koval...@oracle.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 11:39 AM
To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Cc: Sean Carrick <pekins...@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
I don't think we should have com
ins...@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: Products/Components structure for JIRA
I don't think we should have component for every plugin and as for CakePHP
there are only 18 CakePHP specific bugs in Bugzilla. The last one #256685 [1]
was resolved in November 2015.
[1] https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
I don't think we should have component for every plugin and as for
CakePHP there are only 18 CakePHP specific bugs in Bugzilla. The last
one #256685 [1] was resolved in November 2015.
[1] https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256685
And for the record I am against migrating any bugs
If CakePHP isn't listed specifically in the current Bugzilla then it won't
be in the reduced list either. And Bugzilla has never had a component for
each plugin.
The point is to try and maintain a list of products/components as close to
what there currently is, so that we can transfer issues over
Emi,
That's what I was wondering...I couldn't remember if CakePHP was in the
Bugzilla system or not, but could have sworn I'd seen plugins for CakePHP in
NB...
Sean Carrick
VP Information Systems
Integrity Solutions
On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 02:09 +0300, Emilian Bold wrote:
This is a "reduced
This is a "reduced list". I don't see CakePHP in the current Bugzilla
either. I assume it falls under PHP?
--emi
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Sean Carrick wrote:
> Jiri,
>
> Looking through that list, I didn't see the CakePHP framework on the
> list. Isn't CakePHP
Jiri,
Looking through that list, I didn't see the CakePHP framework on the
list. Isn't CakePHP currently supported within NetBeans and shouldn't
there be a bug reporting combination on JIRA?
Sean Carrick
VP Information Systems
Integrity Solutions
On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 19:45 +0200, Jiří Kovalský
Components are used to segregate issues in JIRA. Labels can be shared
between projects/components.
Also components can be assigned to a team, labels can't.
Hi Jirka,
Not know enough about products/components in JIRA, but could we not keep it
simple and use labels?
So a defect could have at least 2 labels: 'apisupport' and 'API docs', or
'utilities' and ‘code’, etc?
Regards
John
> On 12 May 2017, at 18:45, Jiří Kovalský
Hello NetBeans Apache Incubator community,
in order to be prepared for switching NetBeans bug tracking from
Bugzilla to JIRA we need to have appropriate products and categories
created in JIRA.
At the moment there are almost 600 combinations of products and
components in the NetBeans
38 matches
Mail list logo